Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Twenty Questions, Part 2

David S. Pisetsky, MD, PhD  |  Issue: March 2007  |  March 1, 2007

The second lesson I learned is that patient-reported outcomes must be tweaked and tuned for each and every individual. I commend Jim Fries, MD, and all the other contributors to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System initiative. These investigators are taking insights from educational testing and creating elaborate decision trees to assess patient outcomes with detail and precision. I cannot help but think of how such a tree could be constructed for the patient that I saw. “Do you have a full head of hair? If no, are you bald? If yes, do you want to look like Kojak? If yes, can you shave your skull?”

People are different and outcome measures need to capture all of this wonderful variety.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Finally, I learned a lesson that is akin to one that was drilled into me when I was in grade school and high school. During that time, I took hundreds if not thousands of exams, and before each and every one, the teacher said, “Read each question carefully before you answer it.”

In my first administration of the HAQ that day in clinic, I learned an equally important corollary: “Read each question carefully before you ask it.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Pisetsky is physician editor of The Rheumatologist and professor of medicine and immunology at Duke University Medical Center in Durham, N.C.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:OpinionPractice SupportRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:Diagnostic CriteriaHAQHealth Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)Practice Managementrheumatologist

Related Articles

    Twenty Questions, Part 1

    February 1, 2007

    What disease scores can teach you about rheumatology

    Readers Answer ‘Twenty Questions’

    April 1, 2007

    The March Rheuminations column, “Twenty Questions, Part 1” inspired many letters from TR readers. Here are just a few of those responses.

    Treat-to-Target Decisions and Dilemmas

    July 12, 2011

    A better understanding of targets can lead to better outcomes down the road

    Letters to the Editor

    June 1, 2007

    Feedback from Our Readers

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences