Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Understanding & Preparing for Payer Audits

From the College  |  Issue: June 2018  |  June 21, 2018

Audit activity among Medicare and most third-party payers has increased in response to pressure to reduce healthcare costs. The return of billions of dollars to Medicare, Medicaid and third-party programs through these medical audit reviews has also increased. For example, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) 2014 Annual Report estimated that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recouped $36 billion in improper payments from fee-for-service claims under both Medicare Part A and B. This is mainly attributed to the fact that payers have access to providers’ claims data, along with other software programs that allow payers to review claims and billing patterns in an effort to identify the potential for inappropriate billing and fraud.

The most common reasons a provider might be audited include inadequate documentation, unbundling of services, upcoding, inappropriate balance billing and routine waiver of copayments, coinsurance or deductibles. Due to vulnerabilities in provider programs, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has requested ongoing investigations related to coding and billing. CMS created the Medicare contractor programs to assist other federal efforts in identifying and pursuing healthcare fraud and abuse. The five

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Medicare review contractors include:

Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs)

The MACs are responsible for processing and paying Medicare claims and establishing regional policy guidelines, called Local Coverage Determinations (LCD). Because MACs are in the thick of Medicare reimbursement, they are also tasked with identifying overpayments and providing outreach and education to prevent future inappropriate billing.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)

The RAC program began in 2005 as a CMS demonstration program, and has since become permanent. RACs provide additional review of Medicare claims for payment. The goal of RACs is to identify and correct improper payments three years before the start of an audit. The document requests vary by provider type. RACs are paid on a contingency fee basis, and therefore, are highly motivated to identify and collect overpayments.

Supplemental Medical Review Contractors (SMRCs)

The SMRC has the primary task of conducting nationwide medical review as directed by CMS. Medical review is the evaluation of medical records and related documents to determine whether Medicare claims were billed in compliance with coverage, coding, payment and billing guidelines. CMS has contracted with StrategicHealthSolutions, LLC as the SMRC for the entire U.S.

Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT)

The Medicare CERT program was implemented as a mechanism for CMS to assess whether MACs are properly paying claims. The CERT program determines the national Medicare fee for service improper payment rate, which is published on an annual basis.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingFrom the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT)MedicaidMedicareMedicare Administrative ContractorsRecovery Audit ContractorsSupplemental Medical Review ContractorsZone Program Integrity Contractors

Related Articles

    Different Payer Audits Require Different Preparation & Response

    June 21, 2018

    For a provider of healthcare services, payer audits are always a possibility. Both government and private payers consistently monitor providers to prevent fraud, overpayment, and improper billing or coding procedures. Audits can be nerve-racking and intimidating, even if a provider is billing correctly. Improper billing can lead to civil and criminal sanctions. To alleviate some…

    What Rheumatologists Need to Know about Payer Audits

    March 15, 2016

    Both government and private payers continue to aggressively monitor providers to prevent and recover overpayments. This is evidenced by the fact that the number of audits conducted in recent years has increased dramatically. A negative audit finding can result in the need to repay five- or seven-figure amounts. Types of Audits Private Payer Audits Private…

    Medicare Bills Under the Magnifying Glass

    December 1, 2009

    What you need to know about the Recovery Audit Contractor program

    Practice Page: Protecting Your Practice through Compliance

    November 1, 2011

    Compliance programs are an effort by the government to maintain integrity in the healthcare system. These programs target activities causing improper payment to determine their root cause: Was it a mistake or error, was it inefficiency or waste of resources, is the provider bending the rules or abusing the system, or was it intentional deception or fraud? There are also laws dictating the compliance culture within practices and institutions; for example, red-flag rules, antikickback statute, and stark law, to name a few.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences