Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Understanding & Preparing for Payer Audits

From the College  |  Issue: June 2018  |  June 21, 2018

If there is no action against the provider at the end of the review, the practice should take proactive measures to conduct an internal/external review of a random sample of charts to correct any issues that were the focus of the payer audit. If for any reason the audit is not favorable, any claim that is denied should be reviewed for possible appeal. Make sure to visit the private payer’s website for its appeals process. For Medicare, the appeal process has five levels for denied claims:

  1. Redetermination from the intermediary/carrier;
  2. Reconsideration from a qualified independent contractor;
  3. Appeal to an administrative law judge;
  4. Appeal to the Medicare Department Appeals Board; and
  5. Appeal to a federal district court.

To protect your practice, it is imperative to know the appeal timeliness and requirements for each level of appeal, understand the reasons for denial at each level and be aware of recoupment timing. During the brief pause in the appeals process, establish an appeals team, which can include one or more of the following: provider(s), practice manager, coder, compliance officer and/or legal counsel. Every claim for possible appeal should be reviewed to ensure the auditors complied with correct coding guidelines and current medical policies.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Keep in mind, if there is a recoupment request and Medicare does not receive payment within 40 calendar days from the date of the MAC’s first demand letter, Medicare will recoup the full overpayment amount beginning on day 41, meaning the overpayment will be recovered from current payments due or from future claims submitted. In an effort to delay recoupment while performing an internal analysis, submit a rebuttal to your MAC within 15 days of the initial demand letter (no guarantee) and file appeal requests for the first two levels of appeal within specified time frames. Specifically, a provider must file the first-level appeal within 30 days of the initial demand letter to prevent recoupment through the time that a redetermination decision issues. If the redetermination decision is unfavorable, the provider must file the second-level appeal within 60 days of the redetermination decision. If the reconsideration decision is also unfavorable, Medicare will initiate recoupment 30 days after the reconsideration decision is issued. If the reconsideration is partially favorable, and the overpayment sum requires recalculation, recoupment will begin 30 days after the recalculated demand.

Although audits may seem scary, proper preparation and proactive measures can be put in place to mitigate the chance of being audited and protect providers, their staff and the overall practice. Most experts agree the best defense is a good offense. It is important to assess the risk of an audit before it occurs, because unfavorable audits jeopardize the financial viability of a practice. Although it may create more work initially, experts agree that performing a minimum of two internal audits per year may ultimately help reduce any external ones; quarterly internal audits are recommended.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingFrom the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT)MedicaidMedicareMedicare Administrative ContractorsRecovery Audit ContractorsSupplemental Medical Review ContractorsZone Program Integrity Contractors

Related Articles

    Different Payer Audits Require Different Preparation & Response

    June 21, 2018

    For a provider of healthcare services, payer audits are always a possibility. Both government and private payers consistently monitor providers to prevent fraud, overpayment, and improper billing or coding procedures. Audits can be nerve-racking and intimidating, even if a provider is billing correctly. Improper billing can lead to civil and criminal sanctions. To alleviate some…

    What Rheumatologists Need to Know about Payer Audits

    March 15, 2016

    Both government and private payers continue to aggressively monitor providers to prevent and recover overpayments. This is evidenced by the fact that the number of audits conducted in recent years has increased dramatically. A negative audit finding can result in the need to repay five- or seven-figure amounts. Types of Audits Private Payer Audits Private…

    Medicare Bills Under the Magnifying Glass

    December 1, 2009

    What you need to know about the Recovery Audit Contractor program

    Practice Page: Protecting Your Practice through Compliance

    November 1, 2011

    Compliance programs are an effort by the government to maintain integrity in the healthcare system. These programs target activities causing improper payment to determine their root cause: Was it a mistake or error, was it inefficiency or waste of resources, is the provider bending the rules or abusing the system, or was it intentional deception or fraud? There are also laws dictating the compliance culture within practices and institutions; for example, red-flag rules, antikickback statute, and stark law, to name a few.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences