Video: Knock on Wood| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Lupus Nephritis
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Use Time Component When Coding Counseling, Coordination of Care Visits

From the College  |  Issue: April 2017  |  April 17, 2017

rzoze19/shutterstock.com
Although there are seven components for the levels of evaluation and management (E/M) services, most encounter levels are coded on the basis of the history, examination and medical decision making (MDM), which are the key components extracted from documentation in the medical record. However, when counseling and coordination of care for a patient are the predominate activities in the visit, time is the component that can be used to appropriately capture the level of E/M service.

In 1992, time was included as an explicit factor for several categories of E/M services, including office visits, consultations and inpatient services. The time associated with these codes in the CPT Evaluation and Management Service guidelines is considered the average time spent providing a particular level of care to a patient (see Table 1, below, for time codes for outpatient services). To determine when to use time as the key or controlling factor, providers and their coding staff should refer to the specific details outlined in the CPT Evaluation and Management Service guidelines:

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • Counseling and/or coordination of care dominates (more than 50%) the patient encounter;
  • The E/M service must have a reference time identified in the code descriptor;
  • Time must be spent face to face with the patient and/or family member in the office/other outpatient setting or floor/unit time in the hospital or nursing facility; and
  • The extent of the counseling and/or coordination of care must be documented in the medical record.

This means that time alone can be used to select a level of care, regardless of the extent of the history, exam or MDM, if the majority of the encounter involves counseling or coordination of care. For E/M services, counseling may include a discussion of test results, diagnostic or treatment recommendations, prognosis, risks and benefits of management options, instructions, education, compliance and/or risk factor reduction.

But be careful, because it is important to remember criteria are attached to the time component as much as to the history, examination and MDM. Keep in mind when selecting a level of service on the basis of the extent of the history, examination or MDM, sufficient details must be included in the medical record to apply the most accurate level. For example, the provider cannot simply document, “I performed a comprehensive history.” Instead, the provider must document detailed information that is relevant to the patient’s history of present illness, the number of systems reviewed, and past, family and social history. Also, the MDM is not based on a single statement, but is calculated on the basis of the number and type of details documented for each component. The same rationale holds true when using time as the main factor for coding the encounter.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

What really counts when coding is the basis of time. First, only face-to-face time with the patient and/or family member counts in the outpatient setting. Face-to-face time includes not only the time spent counseling, but also the time associated with any history, examination or MDM that is performed. Time spent reviewing records, talking with other providers and documenting the encounter without the patient or family present cannot be considered.

TABLE 1: Typical Times for Outpatient E/M Services

(click for larger image) TABLE 1: Typical Times for Outpatient E/M Services

Second, it is not enough to document only how long the service lasted or that counseling or coordination of care dominated the visit. The documentation must explain the content of the counseling discussion and must describe the activities to coordinate care to support time as the dominating factor, but most importantly, the medical necessity of the service.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Claims Processing Manual, chapter 12, section 30.6.1.C, indicates:1 “Advise physicians that when counseling and/or coordination of care dominates (more than 50%) the face-to-face physician/patient encounter or the floor time (in the case of inpatient services), time is the key or controlling factor in selecting the level of service. In general, to bill an E/M code, the physician must complete at least two out of three criteria applicable to the type/level of service provided. However, the physician may document time spent with the patient in conjunction with the medical decision making involved and a description of the coordination of care or counseling provided. Documentation must be in sufficient detail to support the claim.”

Medicare CMS emphasizes that the CPT code selection is based on the total time of the face-to-face encounter and not just the counseling time, because counseling can also be provided by another staff member, which cannot be included in the encounter as physician–patient face-to-face time.

Quantity of information does not always equal quality, so it is not enough to simply list your clinical impressions and state that more than 50% of the encounter was spent in discussion. This is not sufficient documentation for time-based coding. If the medical record lacks the pertinent details required to justify the counseling and/or coordination of care, then this can cause unintended consequences and failure to meet the requirements to use time as the deciding factor in the E/M level.

Although it is not necessary to document a detailed account of the discussion, the documentation should reflect the nature of the counseling or coordination of care activities to identify the major areas of discussion (e.g., “counseled patient regarding weight gain, daily food intake and goalsetting”); it is important the patient record be thorough enough to justify the amount of time reported.

It is vital for providers to implement best practices in documenting time-based E/M services. Below are three important components to keep in mind to include in the patient’s medical record when using time as the key factor for a level of service:

  1. Document the total time of the visit;
  2. Include the total time spent in counseling and/or coordinating care; and
  3. Provide a summary of the discussion.

For questions or additional information on coding guidelines and documentation for your organization, contact the ACR coding and auditing professionals at [email protected].

Reference

  1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. CMS Manual System. Pub 100-04 Medicare Claims Processing. Transmittal 1875. 2009 Dec 14.

Page: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page
Share: 

Filed under:From the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:BillingCodingevaulationManagementoffice visitpatient carephysicianPractice Managementrheumatologistrheumatologytime

Related Articles

    A New Era of Coding Evaluation & Management Services

    January 25, 2021

    After 25 years, the American Medical Association (AMA) Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) office and outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) codes received a major overhaul. These changes, which went into effect Jan. 1, will help reduce administrative burden on providers and roll back some of the rigid requirements for E/M coding by simplifying the code selection…

    Documentation Guidelines for Proper Medical Decision Making

    June 13, 2017

    Rawpixel.com/shutterstock.com The Medical Decision Making (MDM) of an evaluation and management (E/M) visit is one of the three components of determining the level of a patient’s visit. But the MDM can sometimes be the most difficult component, as this is where the provider’s thought process is quantified in deciding the correct level of E/M service. In…

    Coding Corner Answer: February Coding Challenge

    February 1, 2014

    Coding for an office visit by a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis who is evaluated before starting a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

    Elements of Medical Decision Making for Rheumatologists When Coding and Billing

    November 1, 2012

    What rheumatologists need to know about determining the level of medical decision making (MDM) for an office visit

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences