Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Why & How to Pursue Shared Decision Making with Your Patients

Ruth Jessen Hickman, MD  |  Issue: June 2018  |  June 21, 2018

A variety of other decision support interventions are available, summarizing information in ways easily accessible to patients. These may be brief text or diagrams, or longer, in the form of booklets, DVDs or websites.12 The Mayo Clinic offers a variety of shared decision-making resources, as well as a helpful decision-aid tool for rheumatoid arthritis.

Barriers: Time

In the real world, shared decision making often runs into practical barriers. Dr. Desai sees time as one of the key issues preventing some clinicians from using shared decision making. “If they are a new patient, and you also want to diagnose them and even start them on a treatment, that is really hard to do in 40 minutes in an effective way. The shared decision making takes time, and it often takes more than one visit.” In a brief office visit, clinicians may not feel like they have time to discuss what is most important to patients about their life goals. Unfortunately, existing reimbursement systems provide incentives for short office visits and little financial reward for shared decision making.10

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Many patients wish to learn more about their options before making a decision, and they want time to discuss their options with family members or friends.6 If possible, practitioners should recognize this need and find ways to accommodate it into their practice.

On a systems level, Dr. Desai notes that in some settings, the process of shared decision making may best be implemented through a follow-up visit via telemedicine, after the patient has had time to become educated about their options and consider their values and preferences. Ultimately, new systems may be needed to make time for truly shared decision making and to reward clinicians who engage at that level.6

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Barriers: Patients

Changing the patient/provider communication dynamic will require changes on the part of patients as well. Dr. Cozad and her colleagues are currently accruing data for a project encouraging patients to bring their goals and priorities for care to the clinical encounter. They have created a tool that asks patients questions about their lives and the major symptoms and side effects they would like managed. The tool turns their answers into a graphic that can then be used to share information with their medical provider in a streamlined fashion. “Hopefully, by using that graphic, they can talk about it with their rheumatologist and then improve treatment adherence,” says Dr. Cozad.

Dr. Cozad believes this approach is empowering to patients who may feel bound by the old paternalistic model of medicine. “We wanted to change that mentality and get our patients to realize that by voicing your priorities, preferences and goals, you are more actively participating in your care, and the more actively you participate in your care, the better we can take care of you.”

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Patient Perspective Tagged with:patient-centered carephysician patient relationshipshared decision making

Related Articles

    Rheumatologists Should Discuss with Patients Use of Immunomodulatory Agents During Pregnancy

    November 16, 2016

    The decision to continue or discontinue immunomodulatory medications during pregnancy is a difficult one for both patients and physicians. On the one hand, when left untreated, rheumatic conditions can cause harm to an unborn child, as well as to the pregnant mother. On the other hand, medications can be harmful to a developing fetus. In…

    Rheumatology Practices Need Sharp Focus on Patient Care Safety, Quality

    February 16, 2017

    “It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory.” —W. Edwards Deming For practices to survive, change is a requirement—not an option—in the rapidly evolving practice of rheumatology care. ad goes here:advert-1ADVERTISEMENTSCROLL TO CONTINUEPharmaceutical therapies are advancing quickly, opening the door for game-changing therapies in the treatment of chronic autoimmune disorders. With these advances…

    Why & How Doctors Should Foster Shared Decision Making with Patients

    February 17, 2018

    SAN DIEGO—At the ACR/ARHP 2017 Annual Meeting Nov. 3–8, a session on how to promote shared decision making with patients highlighted the role of the multidisciplinary professional team. And perhaps just as importantly, it noted the importance of providers recognizing their own implicit biases, which can get in the way of shared decision making. Presenters…

    5 Easy-to-Implement Quality Improvement Projects for Rheumatology Practices

    May 16, 2017

    Quality assurance and quality improvement (QA/QI) work makes sense to focus on. However, finding the time and resources for QI projects is not always easy. Until now, the business case for QI in rheumatology practice has not always been clear. However, this is changing with implementation of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA)…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences