Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

5 Takeaways from the ACR’s Gout Clinical Quality Measures

Carina Stanton  |  August 7, 2018

Gout is one of the most common inflammatory arthritis diseases, affecting 8.3 million adults in the U.S.1 It’s also one of the most preventable and treatable diseases, but only 32–58% of patients receive adequate gout treatment, indicating significant room for improvement of care.2

For this reason, the ACR supported a group that developed several electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) that aim to close this gap. These measures give rheumatologists the chance to measure their performance in key areas of gout care, including gout care management, management of urate-lowering therapy, management of patients on urate-lowering therapy, serum urate monitoring and management, allopurinol-specific considerations and gout flare prophylaxis.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“These quality measures are shining a light on gout to show the quality of care being provide to patients with gout and how patients are doing to help us improve patient outcomes,” says John FitzGerald, MD, PhD, interim chief of the division of rheumatology at Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles. As a leader in gout research, Dr. FitzGerald led the ACR group’s work to shape these eCQMs and coauthored a paper outlining the development of these measures.2

Clinical Takeaways
To support rheumatologists and their colleagues in improving gout care management, Dr. FitzGerald outlines five practice takeaways from the eCQMs.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

1. Identify gout patients with hyperuricemia in need of urate-lowering therapy: The first step in managing gout is to identify gout patients with hyperuricemia who require urate-lowering therapy, he says. According to the eQCMs, if a patient with gout has a serum urate (sUA) level greater than 6 mg/dL and has tophus/tophi development of two or more attacks per year, then urate-lowering therapy should be prescribed. This therapy will improve sUA levels, decrease the risk for recurrent attacks and reduce tophus deposition.2

2. Know the treat-to-target threshold for urate levels: Any patient with active gout on urate-lowering therapy should have their serum urate level checked at least once annually—at a minimum and regardless of disease activity. These patients should not have a sUA level above 6.8, according to the eQCMs. For patients being managed for active gout, the ACR recommended treatment target remains less than six, and less than five for patients with severe gout.

However, quality measures are meant to define a minimum threshold for all patients. Through this measure, a patient whose gout has been quiescent for years with <6 serum urate <6.8 mg/dL would not be incentivized to change urate management just for the purpose of lowering serum urate to less than 6 mg/dL if the patient was clinically doing well.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsGout and Crystalline Arthritis Tagged with:Goutpatient careQuality Measuresurate-lowering therapies

Related Articles

    Clinical Insights into Gout Management: Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance Pt. 4

    October 14, 2019

    Three clinical experts on gout offer their insights into common management errors, clinical pearls, new safety data from the FDA and the role of biologic therapies in the management of gout.

    Difficult Gout

    July 1, 2007

    “Grandpapa’s Torments” was the Rodnan Commemorative Gout Print featured at the 2005 ACR/ARHP Annual Scientific Meeting.

    Gout Research at a Glance: ‘My picks for the top research in gout presented at ACR Convergence 2021’

    November 10, 2021

    Dr. Lisa Stamp helps filter the noise to get to the key insights from the research abstracts on gout presented at ACR Convergence 2021.

    Lost and found

    Understanding the Role of Uric Acid in Gout

    September 6, 2022

    From the first substantial argument in the 19th century that uric acid played a role in gout, it took about 100 years for the medical community to accept its role in triggering acute inflammatory gout attacks. Two papers, both published in 1962, helped demonstrate the link between uric acid and acute gout attacks, quickly opening…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences