Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

A Yardstick for Lupus

Staff  |  Issue: August 2007  |  August 1, 2007

In practice, the BILAG Index requires few blood or urine tests and the bulk of the form can be completed on paper or a computer in three or four minutes. The form asks the clinician to determine if a clinical feature, which must be due to lupus, is absent or present. If present, is it better, worse, or the same as a month ago or a new or recurrent problem; these data are converted into A–E scores for each organ/system.

Although somewhat antithetical the concept, the BILAG letter scores were assigned numbers so that they could be converted into a global score and thus compared more easily with SLEDAI and SLAM. In spite of their varying origins, there is a strong correlation among these three indices and also, as shown in later studies, with the European Community Lupus Activity Measure (ECLAM), which was devised by Stephano Bombardieri, MD, and colleagues.6,7 The choice of the A=9, B=3, C=1, D/E=0 point notation, while widely used now, was a rather spur-of-the-moment decision. BILAG is currently performing more objective modeling studies to determine how valid this numbering system is. It is likely that the C score will be downgraded.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

By 1991, most necessary comparisons had been undertaken; the NATO group developed a damage index and selected the patient self-assessment index.8,9 The group was named the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) and grew for the first time in 1991, when Dr. Gladman was appointed its first chair. During the 1990s, a number of distinguished rheumatologists joined, including Michelle Petri, MD, MPH, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore; Ellen Ginzler, MD, MPH, SUNY Downstate, Brooklyn; John Hanly, MD, Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia; Jorge Sanchez-Guerro, MD, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion, Mexico City; Jill Buyon, MD, New York University School of Medicine; and Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman, MD, DrPH, Northwestern University, Chicago, (who succeeded me as chair in 2004).

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
Drs. Bacon, Snaith, and Isenberg (shown left to right) sit in Dr. Bacon’s garden, where – in 1984 – he and Dr. Snaith developed the initial concept for the BILAG Index.

FDA and Tech Boosts

The turning point for the BILAG Index came in 2003 when the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), faced with the prospect of many drug companies wanting to do lupus trials, held a meeting to review the indices available for capturing disease activity in patients with lupus. The FDA concluded that the BILAG Index would be of particular value for clinical trials in SLE, although no member of BILAG was present. The index in its classic form is now widely used in clinical trials around the world.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice Support Tagged with:Lupus

Related Articles

    Mitigate Risk and Increase Success of Lupus Clinical Trials

    August 1, 2010

    Design strategies from a Lupus Research Institute conference

    Target Remission

    March 1, 2007

    Strategies to identify and track remission in your RA patients

    Lupus often presents with a butterfly rash.

    Top 12: Research in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus at a Glance

    November 18, 2021

    Dr. Pisetsky’s picks for the top research in lupus presented at ACR Convergence 2021.

    Phase 2 Trial Results for Sjögren’s Syndrome & SLE Presented in 2nd Plenary Session at ACR Convergence 2022

    November 28, 2022

    PHILADELPHIA—At the second Plenary Session of ACR Convergence on Sunday, Nov. 13, speakers shared compelling efficacy and safety results from two phase 2 trials: remibrutinib for Sjögren’s syndrome and deucravacitinib for moderate to severe systemic lupus erythematosus. Remibrutinib in Phase 2 Sjögren’s Syndrome Trial Thomas Dörner, MD, a professor of rheumatology and clinical immunology for…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences