The Rheumatologist
COVID-19 News
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
      • Gout Resource Center
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Resource Centers
    • Ankylosing Spondylitis Resource Center
    • Gout Resource Center
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
    • From the College
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • ACR Convergence
      • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
      • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
      • Gout Resource Center
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence Home
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Research Reviews
    • ACR Journals
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Image Library
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Events
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / ACR Advocates Against Proposed UHC Policy Changes

ACR Advocates Against Proposed UHC Policy Changes

July 5, 2018 • By From the College

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF

UnitedHealthcare (UHC) recently proposed two policy changes that would have a negative impact on reimbursement for consultation services and evaluation and management (E/M) services when billed with modifier 25. The effective date for both of these proposed changes is Oct. 1, 2018.

You Might Also Like
  • UHC Announces New Policy on National Drug Code Requirement
  • ACR Fights Cigna Decision to Eliminate Consultation Codes
  • ACR Opposes UnitedHealthCare’s Move to End Consultation Reimbursement
Also By This Author
  • Calling Young Rheumatologist Leaders

Consultation Services
Under the proposed consultation codes policy, UHC would end reimbursement for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes 99241–99245 and 99251–99255. UHC announced a similar plan last year, but ultimately rescinded the policy after receiving outcry from a number of physician groups. As the ACR argued last year, the decision to end reimbursement for consultation services is misguided and would have a negative impact on physicians, especially the rheumatology community. Rheumatologists are often asked to provide consultations addressing patients’ most challenging and complex medical problems. This requires not only specialized experience and expertise, but also a significant amount of work, beyond that which is required for a new patient visit, and should therefore be appropriately reimbursed.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

E/M Codes
A second policy change would reduce reimbursement for E/M services by 25% when billed with modifier 25. This plan is similar to a policy that was announced then rescinded by Anthem earlier this year. The ACR strongly opposes this change and believes that providers should be reimbursed appropriately and in accordance with the CPT coding guidelines when performing significant, separately identifiable and medically necessary E/M services on the same day as a procedure.

The ACR is engaging UHC directly and also coordinating with other specialty societies to voice opposition to these policies. For questions or more information, contact practice@rheumatology.org.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

 

Filed Under: From the College, Legislation & Advocacy Tagged With: consultation services, CPT codes 99241–99245 and 99251–99255, Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, evaluation and management (E/M) services, proposed policy changes, reimbursement cuts, UnitedHealthCare (UHC)

You Might Also Like:
  • UHC Announces New Policy on National Drug Code Requirement
  • ACR Fights Cigna Decision to Eliminate Consultation Codes
  • ACR Opposes UnitedHealthCare’s Move to End Consultation Reimbursement
  • UnitedHealthcare to Eliminate Consultation Codes

Meeting Abstracts

Browse and search abstracts from the ACR Convergence and ACR/ARP Annual Meetings going back to 2012.

Visit the Abstracts site »

Simple Tasks

Learn more about the ACR’s public awareness campaign and how you can get involved. Help increase visibility of rheumatic diseases and decrease the number of people left untreated.

Visit the Simple Tasks site »

American College of Rheumatology

Visit the official website for the American College of Rheumatology.

Visit the ACR »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2021 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.