Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2012: Spondylarthritis Criteria Changing Landscape of the Disease

Thomas R. Collins  |  Issue: December 2012  |  December 1, 2012

The ASAS axial SpA criteria have been found to be reliable, with an 82.9% sensitivity rate and an 84.4% specificity rate. That high specificity greatly outpaces past criteria.2

The ASAS classification criteria, she cautioned, were not expressly developed for diagnosis.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Treatment

Home exercise can work well as a nonpharmacological treatment, Dr. van der Heijde said, but she noted that water-based therapy and supervised physical therapy are more effective. As for drug treatment, Dr. van der Heijde said, “NSAIDs are still the cornerstone of the drug treatment for patient with ankylosing spondylitis.”3

Other than that, the only other option is TNF bockers. When NSAIDs fail in AS patients, doctors can go straight to those, she said. That’s a difference from predominantly peripheral SpA, for which there are data showing that sulfasalazine and local corticosteroids also might be helpful. For AS, analgesics are probably not a good option, Dr. van der Heijde said. “There is, in fact, very little evidence that analgesics are also efficacious in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.”3

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Which NSAID is best for treating pain in AS? There is scant evidence that any one of them is better than the others. A German study comparing five types found little difference in treatment for pain.4 The evidence is solid, though, that continuous use of NSAIDs works better than on-demand use when it comes to slowing radiographic progression of the disease, she said.5 And there is even greater benefit from continuous use over on-demand use in patients with elevated CRP levels.6 The data also show that there is a clear benefit, in terms of radiographic progression, to getting a higher dose of an NSAID if the patient has syndesmophytes and elevated CRP levels.7 “But in patients with no syndesmophytes and normal CRP, there’s no difference,” Dr. van der Heijde said.

When NSAIDs fail, TNF blockers are the next step for AS patients. But when to switch? The “2010 update of the international ASAS recommendations for the use of anti-TNF agents in patients with axial spondyloarthritis” offers guidance.8 It suggests that switching is appropriate when two NSAIDs fail over four weeks. More could be tried, but two is enough, especially in cases of patients with active disease. Also, patients being moved to a TNF blocker should have high disease activity—a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score of 4 or higher. In addition, the rheumatologist should be convinced there is active disease calling for the start of a TNF blocker.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Axial SpondyloarthritisConditionsMeeting ReportsResearch Rheum Tagged with:ACR/ARHP Annual MeetingAnkylosing Spondylitisaxial spondyloarthritis (SpA)drugpatient careradiographResearchSteroidsTreatment

Related Articles

    “A Common Language for Spondyloarthritis”

    December 1, 2010

    ASAS fills a niche, changes dogma with consensus approach

    Désirée Van Der Heijde, MD, PhD, a Key Driver of Treatment Advances

    May 8, 2012

    Dr. van der Heijde learned early in her career that serendipity often plays a role in clinical research and treatment advances.

    Rheumatologists Make Progress Defining Spectrum of Axial Spondyloarthritis

    May 1, 2014

    New research clarifies terminology used for diagnosis, but questions remain around epidemiology, genetics and management of patients with axial skeletal inflammation

    The Classification Challenge of Pediatric Spondylarthritis

    April 1, 2010

    Condition often confused with other disorders

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences