Several ACR volunteers and staff members attend these meetings to provide a voice for rheumatology. The ACR representatives to the AMA RUC include Timothy Laing, MD, Eileen Moynihan, MD, Deborah Desir, MD and Fredrica Smith, MD. For the AMA CPT Editorial Committee, the ACR representatives include Dr. Laing and Joseph Huffstutter, MD.
You Might Also Like
Also By This Author
At recent meetings, the RUC and CPT Committee finalized recommendations for relative value and editorial changes to codes that could have an impact on the specialty at large.
RUC Meeting Highlights
At the April 2019 meeting in Chicago, the ACR, along with 50 other specialty societies, convened a consensus panel to present the survey results of the evaluation and management (E/M) code sets for office visits 99201–99215. Earlier this year, in an effort to support burden reduction and ensure appropriate valuation, the E/M CPT/RUC Workgroup created a coding structure for 10 new and revised office visit codes. These codes were also created in response to the CMS’ Final Rule of the CY 2019 physician payment schedule.
The joint survey consisted of over 1,700 respondents for each code from primary care, surgery and medicine, areas that represent 95% of Medicare claims for office visits. This was a huge undertaking; the ACR advisors and staff were involved in various aspects of the survey, data analysis and RUC presentations. The survey results and comparison of applicable codes supported favorable recommended values, which were presented to the RUC panel.
Also, in the CY 2019 Final Rule, the CMS stated that they would consider any changes made to the E/M office visits for both coding and valuation. The ACR and all the national medical societies appreciate this effort and look forward to their response to the survey results. The RUC recommendations from the April 2019 meeting are now being finalized and will be sent over to the CMS for review. If approved, any change in valuation will be part of the CY 2021 physician fee schedule.