Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Antiphospholipid Syndrome: Management & Future Directions

Lara C. Pullen, PhD  |  December 4, 2020

ACR Convergence graphicACR CONVERGENCE 2020—Maria Laura Bertolaccini, PhD, postdoctoral research associate, King’s College London, started off the session on antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) talking about novel and non-criteria antibodies for APS and their potential to predict thrombotic episodes. Currently, three antibody tests are required for the diagnosis and classification of APS: lupus anticoagulant, anti-cardiolipin and anti-β2 glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI). These three, although widely available, are not sufficient to identify all patients with APS. In searching for new diagnostic antibodies, researchers have found that IgG antibodies that recognize epitope Gly40-Arg43 in domain I of β2-gycoprotein I not only cause lupus anticoagulant, but their presence correlates strongly with thrombosis. This area of domain I is likely also covered by a carbohydrate chain in solution, making the epitope cryptic.

Dr. Bertolaccini

Antibodies for APS
A 2006 study found that pathogenic anti-β2-glycoprotein antibodies recognize domain I of β2 glycoprotein only after a conformational change.1 The anti-β2-GPI antibodies thus bind an epitope that is only exposed on β2-GPI when bound to a negatively charged surface. These antibodies to domain I of β2 glycoprotein (anti-DI) have been shown to increase the hazard ratio for APS and to be associated with thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. Additional studies in animal models suggest these anti-DI antibodies are pathogenic. Nevertheless, because they are more specific but less sensitive than anti-β2GPI, their presence does not increase the diagnostic yield and their routine clinical use is still debated.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Data on antibodies to other domains of β2GPI were also presented.

Dr. Bertolaccini discussed antibodies to domain IV/V of β2GPI and explained that available data show these antibodies fail to induce thrombosis in a rat model. That said, preliminary evidence suggests that the anti-DI to anti-D IV/V ratio may be a useful new biomarker for APS that is helpful for identifying pathogenic anti-β2GPI.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

A lot of interest has been directed to antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin antibodies (aPS/PT). Animal models have revealed aPS/PT antibodies to be pathogenic and an independent risk factor for thrombosis. The antibodies are independent of the presence of lupus anticoagulant and their risk is additive to other routine antiphospholipid antibodies. Dr. Bertolaccini explained that, along with lupus anticoagulant and anti-β2 glycoprotein I, aPS/PT offer the best diagnostic accuracy for APS and they may be useful in identifying additional patients with APS.

Treatment of Thrombotic APS
Thomas Ortel, MD, PhD, chief of the Division of Hematology in the Department of Medicine at Duke University Medical Center, Durham, N.C., then presented his current recommendations for the treatment of thrombotic APS, as well as evidence against the use of direct oral anticoagulants. He highlighted three key references that addressed the treatment of thrombotic APS.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ACR ConvergenceConditionsMeeting ReportsOther Rheumatic Conditions Tagged with:ACR Convergence 2020Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome (APS)Hughes Syndromemeeting reports

Related Articles

    Antiphospholipid Antibody Testing Update

    January 13, 2012

    Successes, challenges, and controversies of diagnostic methods for APS

    APS: What Rheumatologists Should Know about Hughes Syndrome

    February 17, 2016

    The problem that dogs the work of all of those treating patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the apparent lack of knowledge of the syndrome, both by the general public, as well as by swaths of the medical fraternity. Perhaps it was ever thus—a syndrome less than 40 years old could be described as new,…

    Why Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome Should Be On Your Radar

    February 1, 2014

    With a wide range of clinical manifestations and frequent occurrence among rheumatology patients, APS is one for rheumatologists to watch

    Put Hughes Syndrome on Your Radar

    April 1, 2007

    Diagnosis of antiphospholipid syndrome is increasing. Here’s how to recognize and treat it

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences