The Rheumatologist
COVID-19 News
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
      • Gout Resource Center
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Resource Centers
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis Resource Center
    • Gout Resource Center
    • Psoriatic Arthritis Resource Center
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
    • Interprofessional Perspective
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
    • From the College
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • ACR Convergence
      • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
      • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
      • Gout Resource Center
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence Home
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Research Reviews
    • ACR Journals
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Image Library
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Events
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / Autoantibodies Against LINE-1 p40 May Be More Common in Patients with Active SLE

Autoantibodies Against LINE-1 p40 May Be More Common in Patients with Active SLE

March 17, 2021 • By Vanessa Caceres

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF

Autoantibodies that react with long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE-1) p40 protein may be common in severe and active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, according to research from Victoria Carter, MS, and colleagues.1

You Might Also Like
  • The Environment Within: A Possible Link Identified Between Plasma Microbial Translocation & Autoantibody Development in 1st Degree Relatives of SLE Patients
  • Newly Diagnosed SLE Patients Have a Greater Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
  • Researchers Calculate Comorbidity Burden for Patients with SLE
Also By This Author
  • Trial Pits Upadacitinib vs. Adalimumab for Psoriatic Arthritis

LINE-1, class I transposable elements in DNA, make up 17% of the human genome. Although most LINE-1 copies are mutated and truncated in the human genome, approximately 180 appear to be intact, with a few that continue to retrotranspose and occasionally disrupt genes or regulatory regions by novel insertions, according to the researchers. Because of this response, defense mechanisms have evolved against retro-elements and retroviruses. Some researchers theorize that many human diseases, including cancer and autoimmune diseases, are connected with LINE-1 biology, and several theories link LINE-1 to the development of SLE and its flares.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

To help test this hypothesis, researchers used highly purified p40 proteins to quantitate immunoglobulin G autoantibodies found in the serum of 172 SLE patients, as well as disease controls (20 patients with systemic sclerosis) and age-matched healthy subjects (78 patients). The first cohort for the study included 10 patients with SLE. In a second SLE cohort, patients were in remission (n=83) or experiencing flare (n=79). The initial group of 10 patients came from the University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, and the remaining patients were from Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

In the majority of patients, as well as in many healthy controls, antibodies reactive with p40 proteins were detected. The results were higher in SLE patients, but not those with systemic sclerosis, when compared with healthy controls. Anti-p40 reactivity was higher during a flare among patients in remission (P=0.03). Anti-p40 reactivity also correlated with several other factors, including Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) (P=0.0002), type I interferon score (P=006), complement C3 decrease (P=0.0001), anti-DNA antibodies (P<0.0001), anti-C1q antibodies (P=0.004) and a current or past history of nephritis (P=0.02). The antibodies were correlated inversely with age. In a study of SLE patient sera, the researchers also found a reaction with p40-associated proteins.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Within the SLE flare population, patients with high titers had higher SLEDAI scores than patients who were below the cutoff of the 90th percentile or more among healthy controls. Current anti-dsDNA antibodies and complement consumption also were associated with anti-p40 antibody levels. “Collectively, these data indicate that higher anti-p40 levels tend to accompany active disease,” the researchers write.

One finding that surprised researchers is a statistically higher inverse correlation of anti-p40 reactivity with SLE patient age (P<0.0001), which may be partially explained by the higher SLEDAI of younger patients, they write. However, even when the full cohort of SLE patients and healthy controls was split into two groups with an age cutoff at 40 years, researchers found a more marked association of anti-p40 reactivity with SLE in the younger group than in the total cohort.

LINE-1 may be a key trigger of SLE, working along with Ro60, La & other RNA binding proteins, according to Tomas Mustelin, MD, PhD.

Future Implications
“Clearly, anti-p40 antibodies do not by themselves herald clinically relevant autoimmunity, but more likely represent an early phase of self-reactivity that may—or may not—progress towards SLE. … Our findings that nearly all SLE patients have autoantibodies against the LINE-1 p40 protein and that these antibodies are associated with disease activity, specific disease manifestations, low complement, other autoantibodies and type I interferons, taken together, suggest that LINE-1 biology is coupled in some way to SLE pathogenesis,” the researchers write.

ad goes here:advert-3
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Conditions, SLE (Lupus) Tagged With: autoantibodies, long interspersed nuclear elements (LINE-1), p40 proteins, SLE

You Might Also Like:
  • The Environment Within: A Possible Link Identified Between Plasma Microbial Translocation & Autoantibody Development in 1st Degree Relatives of SLE Patients
  • Newly Diagnosed SLE Patients Have a Greater Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
  • Researchers Calculate Comorbidity Burden for Patients with SLE
  • EULAR/ACR Criteria Identify SLE in Hospitalized Pericarditis Patients

ACR Convergence

Don’t miss rheumatology’s premier scientific meeting for anyone involved in research or the delivery of rheumatologic care or services.

Visit the ACR Convergence site »

Simple Tasks

Learn more about the ACR’s public awareness campaign and how you can get involved. Help increase visibility of rheumatic diseases and decrease the number of people left untreated.

Visit the Simple Tasks site »

Meeting Abstracts

Browse and search abstracts from the ACR Convergence and ACR/ARP Annual Meetings going back to 2012.

Visit the Abstracts site »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2022 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)