Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Avoid the Trap of Balance Billing

From the College  |  Issue: June 2016  |  June 13, 2016

The federal government is concerned about erroneous balance billing practices as they relate to qualified Medicare beneficiaries. As a result, in February 2016, Medicare revised its MedLearn Matters article, SE1128, Prohibition on Balance Billing Dually Eligible Individuals Enrolled in the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB) Program, indicating: “Federal law bars Medicare providers from balance billing a QMB beneficiary under any circumstances.” See Section 1902(n)(3)(B) of the Social Security Act, as modified by Section 4714 of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997.

QMB is a Medicaid program for Medicare beneficiaries that exempts them from liability for Medicare cost sharing. State Medicaid programs may pay providers for Medicare deductibles, co-insurance and co-payments. However, as permitted by federal law, states can limit provider reimbursement for Medicare cost sharing under certain circumstances. Medicare providers must accept the Medicare payment and Medicaid payment (if any) as payment in full for services rendered to a QMB beneficiary. Medicare providers who violate these billing prohibitions are violating their Medicare Provider Agreement and may be subject to sanctions. (See Sections 1902(n)(3)(C); 1905(p)(3); 1866(a)(1)(A); 1848(g)(3)(A) of the Social Security Act.)

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Providers who participate in traditional Medicare and Medicare Advantage Plans (not only those that accept Medicaid) must follow all of their balance billing exclusions. It is vital that front- and back-office staff members understand the process of balance billing and exclusions for Medicare and private carriers. It is also significant to know the billing process if a patient has dual coverage, whether it is with commercial insurance and/or Medicare. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 prohibits the collection of cost-share amounts directly from dual-eligible individuals (i.e., individuals who have both Medicare and Medicaid). Providers who serve patients who are dually eligible must either accept the payment received as payment in full or seek reimbursement for any cost share from the appropriate state source. For additional information on dual eligibility, visit the CMS website.

To avoid any and all confusion with patient responsibility and uncovered services, it is important for practices to diligently strive to inform patients of their covered services versus what the insurance will pay or will not pay for. The financial impact of writing off charges due to denied claims or patients disputing a bill is inconvenient and inefficient. Physicians and practice managers should review and update all documents and software that are used to capture charges to avoid any outstanding charges in accounts or write-offs. Taking the necessary proactive steps to protect your practice’s financial status is necessary.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingFrom the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:AC&RAmerican College of Rheumatology (ACR)CodingHealth InsuranceMedicaidMedicarePractice Managementrheumatologist

Related Articles

    Practice Page: Is In-house or Outsourced Medical Billing Right for Your Physician Practice?

    February 1, 2014

    What to consider when deciding whether to delegate claims billing in-house or to contract with an outside company

    Medicare Incident-to Billing Rules, Pitfalls

    May 15, 2015

    In today’s busy rheumatology practices, the services of nurse practitioners, physician assistants, occupational therapists and clinical nurse specialists are a great asset for patient flow, as well as increased revenue. As the growth of nonphysician providers (NPPs) in rheumatology practices has evolved, it has become increasingly important to understand the incident-to rules and avoid the…

    How to Bill Medicare Patients for Non-Covered Services

    April 19, 2017

    What do you do when you are presented with a patient who needs treatment but the patient’s insurance company will not pay for the services? Can you provide the services anyway? Who will pay for them? How do you collect payment for such services? If the patient consents to receive the services in spite of…

    New No-Surprises Rules May Affect Rheumatology Services at Hospitals

    April 15, 2022

    This month, we offer an overview of the federal No Surprises Act, which stipulates that healthcare insurers may not surprise patients with out-of-network care bills, instead requiring healthcare providers and insurers to broker price compromises between themselves. The No Surprises Act, enacted on a bipartisan basis in December 2020, protects patients from surprise billing from…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences