Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Updates to Axial Spondyloarthritis Guideline

Carina Stanton  |  September 5, 2019

• TNFi’s are recommended over secukinumab or ixekizumab as the first biologic to be used;

• Secukinumab or ixekizumab is recommended over the use of a second TNFi in patients with a primary nonresponse to the first TNFi;

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

• Secukinumab and ixekizumab are favored over tofacitinib;

• Co-administration of low-dose methotrexate with a TNFi is not recommended, nor is a strict treat-to-target strategy, or discontinuation or tapering of biologics as a standard approach in patients with stable disease;

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

• Sulfasalazine is recommended only for persistent peripheral arthritis when TNFi’s are contraindicated; and

• For patients with unclear disease activity, spine or pelvis MRI could aid assessment. Routine monitoring of radiographic changes with serial spine radiographs is not recommended.

Please refer to the full guideline for a complete list of recommendations—and whether they are strongly recommended, conditionally recommended, conditionally recommended against or strongly recommended against—for each condition.

Practice Implications

Dr. Ward further explains three key guideline updates and how they will affect patient treatment.

Sequencing biologics for patients with active AS despite non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) usage: For these patients, the recommendations are to first treat with a TNFi, provided there are no contraindications, Dr. Ward explains. “If there is a good response to the first TNFi, but effectiveness is lost over time, the recommendation is to treat with a different TNFi. If there is little or no response to the first TNFi, the recommendation is to treat with an IL-17 inhibitor. There is no preference for using any particular TNFi, but this is not the case if the patient has particular co-morbid conditions, such as recurrent uveitis or inflammatory bowel disease, when TNFi monoclonal antibodies should be used.”

Whether to taper or discontinue biologics in the setting of remission: For patients in sustained remission, the recommendation against tapering of biologics as a standard approach is conditional, Dr. Ward explains, noting that treatment is often needed long-term, and the evidence at present does not support that tapering after a certain amount of time in remission will not result in return of symptoms. He says that “as a standard approach” is an important qualifier, because tapering could be considered in some patients with shared decision making.

“This is why the recommendation is conditional,” he says. “The recommendation against discontinuation of biologics was also conditional, because the limited evidence suggests symptoms recur in many patients. Thus, many patients may want to stay on their medication to ensure this does not happen.”

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Axial SpondyloarthritisClinical Criteria/Guidelines Tagged with:Ankylosing SpondylitisAS Resource Centeraxial spondyloarthritis (SpA)Clinical GuidelinesMichael Ward

Related Articles
    Andrew Brookes / Image Source on Offset

    Clinical Insights into Axial Spondyloarthritis: Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 5

    February 10, 2022

    Over the past few years, biosimilars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug options; others have few or only off-label options. This series, Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and other medications used to…

    Rheumatologists Make Progress Defining Spectrum of Axial Spondyloarthritis

    May 1, 2014

    New research clarifies terminology used for diagnosis, but questions remain around epidemiology, genetics and management of patients with axial skeletal inflammation

    Top Research in Axial Spondyloarthritis Presented at ACR Convergence 2022

    November 18, 2022

    PHILADELPHIA—Approximately 100 research abstracts on axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) were accepted for presentation at ACR Convergence 2022. It is exciting to see a wealth of research on axSpA being undertaken worldwide. Here, we highlight important points from 10 of these studies. 1. Abstract 0378: Prevalence of Axial Spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in Patients Treated for Chronic Back Pain…

    Nelosa/shutterstock.com

    Men, Women & Medical Differences in Axial Spondyloarthropathy

    October 24, 2019

    Historically, ankylosing spondylitis was considered mainly a male disease. But it has become evident this predominance is not as great as previously believed. Here we discuss recent developments in the area, including potential differences between the sexes in symptom and disease burden, immunological and genetic background, diagnostic delay, treatment response and ongoing research questions. Medical…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences