Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Best Lupus Treatment Still Up for Debate

Kathy Holliman  |  Issue: December 2009  |  December 1, 2009

Mary Ann Dooley, MD, MPH, associate professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, referred to the lack of data for treating black patients with CY. The rate of lupus in blacks is three times that of whites, Dr. Dooley said. About 40% of black patients treated with six months of CY therapy end up on dialysis at the end of five years, she said, adding that Boumpas and others have reported racial disparities with CY therapy.3-4

Although MMF may be an alternate therapy and can be used in patients who have not responded to IV CY, there are concerns, she said. Most importantly, there are no published long-term follow-up data beyond about three years. The Apreva Lupus Management Trial found that response rates did not vary between MMF and IV CY, she said.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Dooley said that she would begin treatment in this high-risk patient with six monthly doses of IV CY and then switch to either MMF or AZ with another biopsy before continuing treatment.

Dr. Ginzler cited data from a Food and Drug Administration– funded, randomized, open-label trial that compared the two agents as induction therapy. Those data, she said, suggested that MMF is superior to CY for achieving remission and is also better tolerated. Patients received either MMF or monthly IV CY. The primary endpoint was complete remission at six months; the secondary endpoint, partial remission. An intention-to-treat analysis found that significantly more patients had complete remission with MMF; the partial remission rate was also more frequent with MMF.5

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“One needs to consider the long-term effects,” Dr. Ginzler said. “It has been suggested that MMF acid has antiproliferative effects that are not related to immunology of the treatment, with a decrease in smooth muscle cell proliferation, decrease in fibroblast cell proliferation. This effect may be important in the prevention of progression of renal disease to end-stage disease and … for decrease in risk of atherosclerosis in lupus patients,” she said.

Her choice for the 34-year-old black woman would be 3 gm/daily of MMF, building up to that over a month and continuing with the 3-gram dose “as long as tolerated.” At three years, she would consider tapering the MMF and eventually discontinuing it.6 That decision would depend on the patient’s immunologic parameters, her blood pressure, level of serum creatinine, and degree of proteinuria, Dr. Ginzler said.

Dr. Houssiau said that the Euro-Lupus regime is generally the better strategy: Begin with low-dose IV CY, and then treat with AZ. “Induction IV therapy is very important to ensure optimal compliance. We know that noncompliance is a major issue in treatment of lupus long term,” Dr. Houssiau said. AZ is his first choice for maintenance therapy because it costs less, can be continued during pregnancy, and has a good toxicity profile. Results of the MAINTAIN trial, which were presented at the ACR meeting, showed that MMF was not superior to AZ for prevention of renal relapses at a median follow-up of 53 months.7

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Tagged with:azathioprinecyclophosphamideGlucocorticoidsLupus nephritismycophenolate mofetilprednisonerituximab

Related Articles

    Immunosuppressive Treatment for Lupus in the Next Decade

    April 13, 2011

    It’s time for a new strategy

    Tacrolimus Use for Lupus Nephritis Raises Debate over Role in North American Population

    October 10, 2016

    The following summary regarding use of tacrolimus (TAC) in lupus nephritis highlights a number of debatable points. Although the role of TAC in lupus nephritis remains unproved for North American populations, it might be an excellent option in some clinical situations. These situations include lupus flare during pregnancy and also for lupus nephritis when the…

    Reading Rheum

    October 1, 2009

    Handpicked Reviews of Contemporary Literature

    TNF Blockade for SLE

    September 1, 2010

    Reckless approach versus missed opportunity?

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences