Video: Knock on Wood| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Lupus Nephritis
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Biosimilar Prescribing Habits in the VA & Academic Settings

Arthritis & Rheumatology  |  June 29, 2020

Introduction & Objectives

More than 20 biosimilars have been approved for marketing in the U.S., and more than 50 have been approved in Europe. Non-medical, mandatory switching and required use of a biosimilar for patients newly initiating treatment have resulted in the rapid uptake of biosimilars in some Scandinavian countries. However, in the U.S., changes in biosimilar prescribing patterns have occurred gradually in the absence of similar large-scale mandates from healthcare institutions or payers. Few studies have investigated the uptake of biosimilars in the U.S.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Currently in the U.S., Medicare (one of the largest payers for infused therapies) is not permitted to negotiate drug prices. Infused therapies are reimbursed based on the average selling price (ASP) over the prior quarter. Biosimilar therapies that are priced lower than their reference products (lower ASP) will have lower reimbursement rates and may have less room to negotiate with institutions for a lower purchase price compared with the reference product. Because the financial incentive to use a product depends on the difference between the reimbursement rate and the purchase price, an institution may not have an incentive to use the lower priced product. This may result in slow adoption of biosimilars and negatively impact the ability of these products to effectively stem increasing healthcare costs.

Baker et al. set out to compare the uptake in biosimilar ordering at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) to that at an academic medical center, where institutional incentives for infused medications differ.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Methods

These researchers performed a cross-sectional study of medical record data and estimated institutional financial incentives at two medical centers in Philadelphia: 1) the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS), and 2) the local VAMC. All ordering events for filgrastim or infliximab products were quantified over time and stratified according to product (biosimilar vs. reference product) and center. Financial incentives to the institutions over time were determined based on actual drug costs for the VAMC, and average sales prices (ASPs) and Medicare Part B reimbursement rates for UPHS.

Results

UPHS had 15,761 infusions of infliximab, of which 99% were for the reference product. The VAMC had a sharper decline in the use of reference products; 62% of the 446 infliximab infusions ordered at the VAMC were for the reference product. ASPs were consistently lower for biosimilar infliximab products, but the estimated institutional financial incentives remained similar over time for biosimilar and reference infliximab at UPHS.

At the VAMC, the costs for 100 mg vials of reference infliximab and infliximab-abda were $623.48 and $115.58, respectively: a $507.90 (81%) savings per vial.

Conclusion

The uptake of infliximab biosimilars has been slow at an academic medical center compared with a nearby VAMC, where financial savings are realized by the institution from biosimilar use. Slow adoption of biosimilar medications may impact the rates of decline in costs.

Refer to the full study for all source material.

Excerpted and adapted from:

Baker JF, Leonard CE, Lo Re, V III, et al. Biosimilar uptake in academic and Veterans Health Administration settings: Influence of institutional incentives. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020 Jul;72(7).

Page: 1 2 | Multi-Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug UpdatesResearch Rheum Tagged with:Arthritis & RheumatologyBiosimilarsprescribingResearch

Related Articles

    Possible Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab on U.S. Market in Prescriptions, Pricing

    September 8, 2016

    paulista/shutterstock.com The use of biosimilars for rheuma­tology in the U.S. became a reality when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), a biosimilar to Remicade (infliximab), in April. What this may mean is increased competition among drug companies with regard to pricing and, therefore, potentially lower costs for U.S. patients, according to…

    Marching to the Biosimilar Beat: Questions on Rollout Remain

    September 7, 2023

    The availability of biosimilars for the treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases exploded in 2023. Here’s where we stand and what to expect going forward.

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    Biosimilars are much bigger and more complex on the molecular level than small- molecule drugs. On the right is the small-molecule structure of aspirin (21 molecules). On the left is a monoclonal antibody made up of 10,000–20,000 molecules. The various biosimilar drugs depicted include monoclonal antibodies, scFv, Fab, and scFab, whereas the small-molecule drugs are…

    The Biosimilars Debate Heats Up: Potential cost savings weighed against patient health & safety

    March 1, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences