Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Biosimilars: Unanswered Questions

Susan Bernstein  |  July 5, 2016

“With biosimilars, we’re talking about demonstrating similarity to a reference product that [has already proved] to be safe and effective,” said Dr. Christl. “When we talk about switching drugs in the U.S., that’s interchangeability, which is [held to] a different standard. But biosimilarity is not [held to] a lesser standard of safety and efficacy. The impact of switching and alternating drugs—the data must address that.”

Distinct names will promote pharmacovigilance, making it easier to monitor, track, and report adverse events for biosimilars, Dr. Christl added. The Academy of Managed Care Pharmacists has launched a program, the Biologics and Biosimilars Collective Intelligence Consortium, to help pharmacists report and track these data.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Cost Creates Urgency
Surging costs of biologics make solving these issues a pressing matter, because many patients can’t access life-changing therapies, said Barbara Finck, MD, chief medical officer of Coherus Biosciences and a rheumatologist. Biosimilars will create competition that could save patients money while still meeting the same high standards, she said.

“Biosimilarity is really about variability. It’s about how close we can match that innovator drug. If it matches closely enough, you may not even need a clinical trial,” said Dr. Finck.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Biosimilars could cost as much as 20% less than biologics, improving patient access, said Leigh Purvis, director of health services research for AARP. Cost sharing for patients has risen dramatically, so even with insurance, they can’t afford biologics.

“We don’t think there’s anything to be afraid of,” Ms. Purvis said. “The FDA has safety and efficacy covered. We want the competition. The competition will only happen if you allow substitution.”

Work Together
The debate around biosimilars is complex, but if stakeholders work together, the obstacles can be overcome to the benefit of everyone, said Dr. Worthing.

“It’s easy to get lost in the weeds of regulatory issues, but biosimilar naming, labeling and interchangeability issues have real and profound safety and health consequences for patients,” he said. “Rheumatologists are looking forward to prescribing biosimilars.”


Susan Bernstein is a freelance medical journalist based in Atlanta.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug Updates Tagged with:ACR Government Affairs CommitteeBiologics & Biosimilarsrheumatic diseases

Related Articles
    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    The Biosimilars Debate Heats Up: Potential cost savings weighed against patient health & safety

    March 1, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    Marching to the Biosimilar Beat: Questions on Rollout Remain

    September 7, 2023

    The availability of biosimilars for the treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases exploded in 2023. Here’s where we stand and what to expect going forward.

    Report on EU’s Experience with Biosimilar Drugs Released: Will U.S. Experience Be Similar?

    October 17, 2017

    As questions about biosimilar medications swirl among U.S. rheumatologists, a recently released report sheds some light on the European experience with biosimilars—and may offer some important insights for the U.S. market. The report, Biosimilars in the EU: Information Guide for Healthcare Professionals, was released in late April by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences