Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Can IL-6 Predict Sarilumab Response?

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  January 2, 2019

CHICAGO—Previously, the RA-MOBILITY (NCT01061736) and SARIL-RA-MONARCH (NCT02332590) clinical trials showed that sarilumab had significantly improved efficacy when treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) compared with adalimumab and methotrexate. Recent post-hoc analyses of the trials examined if a patient’s baseline interleukin (IL) 6 levels were associated with radiographic and clinical responses to sarilumab vs. other treatments.

Presented during the 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, the new analyses demonstrate that, at baseline, RA patients with high IL-6 levels and higher disease activity and joint damage had a better response to 200 mg of sarilumab than to methotrexate monotherapy, and adalimumab treatment in patients who had low IL-6 levels at baseline.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

For the studies, baseline IL-6 levels were measured using a validated assay in patients (N=1,193) randomized to 150 mg of subcutaneous sarilumab every two weeks plus methotrexate, 200 mg of subcutaneous sarilumab every two weeks plus methotrexate, or placebo plus methotrexate. Additionally, 300 patients were randomized to 200 mg sarilumab every two weeks or 40 mg of adalimumab every two weeks. Efficacy was compared between and within treatment groups according to baseline IL-6 tertile, using linear and logistic regression.

During the MOBILITY trial, placebo plus methotrexate-treated patients in the high tertile developed more joint damage than patients in the low tertile. Sarilumab-treated patients with high IL-6 levels demonstrated improved clinical signs and symptoms and had less radiographic evidence of joint damage compared with methotrexate-monotherapy-treated patients with high IL-6 levels. In SARIL-RA-MONARCH, sarilumab-treated patients with high IL-6 levels were more likely to achieve disease remission at Week 24 compared with adalimumab-treated patients.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Data show that high IL-6 may be better than high C-reactive protein levels at predicting sarilumab efficacy outcomes in RA patients. In this study, across clinical and radiographic endpoints, patients with elevated baseline levels of IL-6 had a greater response to sarilumab treatment compared with methotrexate or adalimumab than patients with normal IL-6 levels. The authors suggest a prospective study to confirm these data.


Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP, is a freelance medical writer based in New York City and a pharmacist at New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital.

Reference

  1. Boyapati A, Msihid J, Schwartzman S, et al. High baseline serum IL-6 identies a subgroup of rheumatoid arthritis patients with rapid joint damage and clinical progression and predicts increased sarilumab treatment response [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2018 Oct; 70 (suppl 10).

Share: 

Filed under:Drug Updates Tagged with:adalimumabMethotrexatesarilumab

Related Articles

    FDA Approves Sarilumab for the Treatment of Adults with Glucocorticoid-Resistant PMR

    March 14, 2023

    Sarilumab is now FDA approved to treat adults with polymyalgia rheumatica who have had an inadequate response to glucocorticoids or who cannot tolerate a glucocorticoid taper. This new indication is based on results from the multicenter, phase 3 SAPHYR trial.

    New Findings for Polymyalgia Rheumatica & Osteoarthritis

    December 1, 2022

    The Plenary III Session reviewed the results of the SAPHYR trial of sarilumab in PMR patients, as well as the WE-CAN study on the impact of a community-level diet & exercise program on knee pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

    Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 3: Rheumatoid Arthritis

    August 16, 2019

    Over the past few years, bio­similars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug options, others have few or only off-label options. This series, “Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance,” provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and small molecule inhibitor drugs…

    Sarilumab Is Effective for RA, Pregabalin Fails to Meet Study Endpoint & Ibuprofen Can Be Administered with a Patch

    January 13, 2016

    Sarilumab is proving effective for treating RA. In a clinical trial, pregabalin did not meet its endpoint for treating post-traumatic peripheral neuropathic pain. And a 12-hour ibuprofen patch is in development…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences