Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Changes in Bone Markers Predict Fracture Reduction with Anti-Resorptive Drug

Will Boggs MD  |  January 17, 2018

NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—Treatment-related changes in bone formation markers predict vertebral-fracture reduction with anti-resorptive drug therapy, according to a meta-regression analysis of 14 clinical trials.

“These results may be useful for the development of new osteoporosis treatments or when considering new populations or dosing regimens with existing treatments,” Dr. Douglas C. Bauer from the University of California, San Francisco, told Reuters Health by email.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Drugs used to prevent and treat osteoporosis typically cause short-term changes in bone-turnover markers, but few studies have linked these changes to subsequent fracture reduction.

Dr. Bauer and colleagues in the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Bone Quality Project analyzed individual-level data from 28,000 participants enrolled in 14 fracture-endpoint trials (11 of bisphosphonate and three of selective estrogen receptor modulator) in order to determine whether short-term changes in bone-turnover markers (BTMs) predict fracture outcomes.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In general, greater reductions in BTMs with therapy were associated with greater reductions in fracture risk, and the association was more striking for bone-formation markers – bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (bone ALP) and pro-collagen I N-propeptide (PINP) – than for bone-resorption markers (N-terminal and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen).

A 12% net reduction in bone ALP predicted a 33% reduction in vertebral fracture risk, and a 30% net reduction in bone ALP predicted a 65% reduction in fracture risk, the researchers report in the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, online January 10.

Similarly, for PINP, a 22% net reduction predicted a 30% reduction in vertebral fracture risk, and a 50% net reduction predicted a 62% reduction in fracture risk.

In meta-regression analyses, changes in bone ALP and PINP significantly predicted vertebral-fracture risk, but none of the BTMs significantly predicted the risk of nonvertebral or hip fractures.

“Fracture-endpoint trials for osteoporosis treatments are large and expensive, so relatively few new agents are expected in the near future,” Dr. Bauer said. “Our data suggest short-term changes in several bone turnover markers predict subsequent vertebral fractures.”

“Pooling individual-level data from multiple trials sponsored by pharmaceutical companies is feasible and may help expedite the testing of effective osteoporosis treatments,” he added.

Senior author Dr. Richard Eastell from the University of Sheffield, UK, told Reuters Health by email, “Our hope is that when drugs are developed for use in osteoporosis the changes in the markers will help to identify the optimal dose and regimen. For clinical use, the results support the use of bone-turnover markers for monitoring osteoporosis therapy. The greater the change in bone-turnover marker, the greater the therapeutic benefit.”

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsDrug UpdatesOsteoarthritis and Bone Disorders Tagged with:anti-resorptive drug therapybone marker changesfracture reductionFracturesOsteoporosisosteoporosis treatments

Related Articles

    Build Up Bone

    June 1, 2007

    Current management of osteoporosis

    Unexpected Benefits of Bisphosphonates after Hip Fracture

    February 3, 2012

    Recent trials show this bisphosphonates can reduce subsequent hip fractures and mortality, while remaining cost effective.

    Targeted Vertebral Fracture Assessment

    September 7, 2020

    A Canadian study sought to identify individuals at high fracture risk and provide them with pharmacotherapy to prevent fractures. They found the assessment of hip and lumbar dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans for vertebral fracture can be useful in the identification of women and men aged 70 years and older who should qualify for anti-osteoporosis treatment…

    Imaging in Ankylosing Spondylitis

    April 1, 2015

    MRI inflammation, fat and new bone formation in the sacroiliac joints, spine in patients with AS

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences