Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Clinical Documentation Improvement Programs Can Protect Physicians

From the College  |  Issue: August 2014  |  August 1, 2014

One of the key reasons to self-audit a practice’s documentation and billing process is to identify areas in the practice that could potentially put the practice at risk. The Office of Inspector General describes seven elements it relies on as a foundation for provider compliance; the first of the seven is auditing.

All practice staff knows that even when the ICD-9-CM and CPT codes are assigned correctly for an encounter, the claim may be denied, rejected or not properly paid due to a multitude of reasons. The practice performance audit endeavors to evaluate any errors, timeliness of practice processes and inefficiencies within the practice that may result in incorrect, delayed or denial for payment for services.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Key guidelines to follow when performing practice audits:

  • Select random charts; this will help with looking at the variety of services performed. It will not profit the practice if only selected visits are reviewed, which can leave the practice vulnerable if certain visits are not reviewed;
  • Physicians should not review their own charts, because it’s almost impossible to be unbiased when looking at one’s work. It’s important for the person reviewing the charts to have knowledge of coding rules and guidelines and understand how to complete an audit review worksheet;
  • Practices should use the same rules auditors use to review charts. Although many payers may interpret guidelines differently, they usually follow some key rubrics when it comes to auditing physician charts; and
  • Auditing results should be educational, because this is a learning opportunity for the entire practice. Physicians should have the chance to review the results and discuss openly.

Clinical Documentation

In addition to reviewing the services documented and ordered vs. what was coded and billed, a practice performance audit should review signature requirements for physicians and other healthcare professionals. Services that can’t be validated based on third-party guidelines should be reviewed and possibly reported and refunded if reimbursement was received for services.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Coding

The most common practice performance audits are for coding the diagnoses and procedures. When conducting a coding audit, the following components should be incorporated as part of the practice performance audit:

  • Assigned codes vs. audited codes;
  • Assigned codes vs. codes on the explanation of benefits; and
  • Assigned codes vs. codes on claim that was sent to carrier.

The key to ensuring all reimbursable services are captured in the medical record is to develop a method to identify any noncaptured services and to make revisions and additions to charge documents and billing systems. This method will help to capture money that otherwise would be lost to the practice.

Analysis & Process Improvement

Performing a documentation improvement initiative or performance audit accomplishes very little unless a serious effort is put forth to correct problems that are identified. Once the information from a practice performance audit is compiled, the data should be recorded and analyzed. By identifying areas of deficiency or those that need improvement, practices can begin the process to:

  • Improve documentation if necessary;
  • Decrease days in data entry and improve collections;
  • Reduce days in accounts receivable;
  • Implement mechanisms to identify services that were missed and not captured; and
  • Provide education to providers and staff areas that are deficient.

Although these quality and compliance initiatives are burdensome and do nothing for patient quality care, physician practices will still need to avoid any potential risk and liability associated with improper coding and billing. It is a well-known fact the government is intensifying its efforts to crack down on medical fraud and abuse. Monitoring tools should be developed and put in place to track and audit the coding and billing aspects of the practice. Audits should be performed on a regular basis and made a part of the practice’s compliance program. This can be done by starting out small and by selecting areas that are possibly at risk.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingFrom the CollegeInformation TechnologyPractice SupportTechnologyTechnology Tagged with:AuditsBillingclinical documentationCodingphysicianPractice ManagementrheumatologistrheumatologyTechnology

Related Articles

    Different Payer Audits Require Different Preparation & Response

    June 21, 2018

    For a provider of healthcare services, payer audits are always a possibility. Both government and private payers consistently monitor providers to prevent fraud, overpayment, and improper billing or coding procedures. Audits can be nerve-racking and intimidating, even if a provider is billing correctly. Improper billing can lead to civil and criminal sanctions. To alleviate some…

    What Rheumatologists Need to Know about Payer Audits

    March 15, 2016

    Both government and private payers continue to aggressively monitor providers to prevent and recover overpayments. This is evidenced by the fact that the number of audits conducted in recent years has increased dramatically. A negative audit finding can result in the need to repay five- or seven-figure amounts. Types of Audits Private Payer Audits Private…

    Prepare NOW for ICD-10 Medical Coding Transition

    Prepare NOW for ICD-10 Medical Coding Transition

    July 14, 2015

    The ICD-10 page on the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) website features a countdown clock that shows the time left until Oct. 1, 2015, the date on which compliance with the new code set becomes mandatory. By the time this issue goes to press, the clock will read 90 or fewer days. Time…

    Phase 2 of HIPAA Audit Program Launches

    May 13, 2016

    With many competing priorities facing physician practices, HIPAA compliance and security is not a topic that usually makes it to the top of the list. But this is not the case with the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR), because it has initiated a new phase of audits of physician…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences