Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Clinician Call to Action

Terry Hartnett  |  Issue: April 2007  |  April 1, 2007

The workforce survey also asked practices if they planned to hire now or in the next five years—and the response is another indicator that practice redesign is needed. The survey asked rheumatologists if they planned to hire now or in the future, a rheumatologist, a pediatric rheumatologist, a PA, or a nurse practitioner (NP). The results indicate a strong demand for rheumatology services.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
Who Is Hiring?
click for large version
Who Is Hiring?

Change Your Practice

In the article “Pre-Appointment Management of New Patient Referrals in Rheumatology: A Key Strategy for Improving Health Care Delivery,” Dr. Harrington and Michael B. Walsh, DO, discuss implementation of a screening process for newly referred patients. This article, profiled in the workforce study report, outlines strategies that have been implemented by many ACR members to respond to the need for practice redesign. It listed three general strategies for improvement:

  1. New patient screening;
  2. Improved appointment scheduling; and
  3. Improved quality of care for chronically ill patients.

Dr. Harrington and others have implemented a screening process for all new patients that follows an algorithm for determining if and when the patient should be seen by the rheumatologist, referred to another specialist or pain center, or referred back to the primary care physician. The rheumatologist reviews each case to make this determination. Some of the patients not seen by the rheumatologist were referred to an orthopedist or spine program. “Others were assured that their treatment through the primary care physician was appropriate,” the report notes. “The review of patient records prior to the first appointment had other benefits … it allowed the rheumatologists more information on the patient prior to the appointment so that they could decide whether a brief or longer visit was needed. Also, with the records on hand, duplicate testing occurred less frequently.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Harrington tells The Rheumatologist that he was forced to look at redesigning his own practice when he lost the services of an orthopedic spine specialist and wait times in his practice went from two months to six months.

At that time, he and colleagues decided to take a deeper look at the 120 patients on his six-month waiting list and found that half had either gotten better or seen another physician during the six-month period. “As rheumatologists, we need to enforce clinical practice guidelines,” says Dr. Harrington. “We have to learn to do a better job of pre-appointment assessment and management. For instance, if we get a call from a patient with back pain for three days after lifting, the appropriate clinical assessment would send that patient to the primary care physician.”

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportTechnologyWorkforce Tagged with:AC&RElectronic medical recordsOutcomespatient carePractice Managementrheumatology

Related Articles

    Rheumatology and the Patient-Centered Home

    July 1, 2010

    Is it the end of the tunnel or an oncoming train?

    Letter: Tips to Improve Osteoporosis Screening Rates

    October 16, 2017

    Osteoporosis Screening The aphorism, “Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it,” applies to The Rheumatologist August 2017 article that documents the continued low screening rates for those at high risk for osteoporosis-related fragility fractures, in particular people older than 65 and those who have suffered a fracture already. So here’s a…

    9 Steps to Transform Your Rheumatology Practice

    August 12, 2020

    The ACR position statement on access to care proposes the goal that “… all patients have timely access to expert rheuma­tology care … .”1 The reality is that new and established rheumatology patient wait times are often prolonged, causing delays in necessary diagnosis and treatment. The 2005 and 2015 ACR Workforce studies document intractable and…

    Who Will Treat Arthritis in 2005?

    January 1, 2007

    ACR study documents shortage of rheumatologists and predicts greater shortfalls to come

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences