Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Clinician Call to Action

Terry Hartnett  |  Issue: April 2007  |  April 1, 2007

Dr. Harrington recommends using a standardized history form that uses branching logic. Give the form to patients while they are in the waiting room and have NPs and PAs who have training in the protocols assist the patient and then provide a summary to the rheumatologist before the actual patient time with the doctor. The standard form has a disease activity score that the NP or PA then can use to qualify the patient’s needs. “We need to learn how to function like dentists and use other clinical staff (e.g., the dental hygienist) to share the workload,” says Dr. Harrington.

He also urges rheumatology practices to switch to electronic medical records (EMRs). (See “Go Digital,” p. 1.) Despite their proven ability to enhance practice management and streamline patient care, only 15% of rheumatologists currently use EMRs.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The technological changes like EMRs and changes in practice organization and design provide a backdrop for fundamental workforce supply and demand and for the primary goal of improving patient outcomes.

“All of the things that we have identified as improvements in practice also improve patient outcomes,” says Dr. Harrington. He stresses that the ACR workforce study report is just the opening round of the discussion on how to further improve.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Retirement Effects

The workforce study highlighted the need to increase the number of U.S. rheumatologists in order to meet future demand for services. One key factor in whether the supply of specialists in the future will meet the demand is the number of rheumatologists planning to retire in the next five to 10 years. Rates of retirement are not available for rheumatologists specifically, but general data on physician specialists suggests what the workforce study called “substantial declines” in rheumatologists between age 59 and 68. “Beyond age 68, the labor force participation rates level off with about 60% of male and 40% of female professionals continuing to participate in the labor force through age 75 at which point the predictive model assumes all rheumatologists will have retired.”

Wait-Reduction Strategies
click for large version
Wait-Reduction Strategies

The workforce survey ­asked respondents when they planned to reduce their work efforts either prior to or at full retirement. Younger rheumatologists plan to reduce work effort earlier than their older counterparts, as do women. This data may be biased because any physicians currently older than 60 who have retired were not counted in the results. Overall, rheumatologists expressed satisfaction with their current work level and environment. About half said they would like their current workload to remain the same; the other half said they wanted their workload to decrease.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice SupportTechnologyWorkforce Tagged with:AC&RElectronic medical recordsOutcomespatient carePractice Managementrheumatology

Related Articles

    Rheumatology and the Patient-Centered Home

    July 1, 2010

    Is it the end of the tunnel or an oncoming train?

    Letter: Tips to Improve Osteoporosis Screening Rates

    October 16, 2017

    Osteoporosis Screening The aphorism, “Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it,” applies to The Rheumatologist August 2017 article that documents the continued low screening rates for those at high risk for osteoporosis-related fragility fractures, in particular people older than 65 and those who have suffered a fracture already. So here’s a…

    9 Steps to Transform Your Rheumatology Practice

    August 12, 2020

    The ACR position statement on access to care proposes the goal that “… all patients have timely access to expert rheuma­tology care … .”1 The reality is that new and established rheumatology patient wait times are often prolonged, causing delays in necessary diagnosis and treatment. The 2005 and 2015 ACR Workforce studies document intractable and…

    Who Will Treat Arthritis in 2005?

    January 1, 2007

    ACR study documents shortage of rheumatologists and predicts greater shortfalls to come

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences