Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Coding and Billing Guidelines Overview and Resources

Melesia Tillman, CPC, CPC-I, CRHC, CHA  |  Issue: September 2011  |  September 1, 2011

Due to federal regulations and the variety of audits that now exist, the ACR has developed an overview of guidelines and identified a list of resources to keep handy to ensure all current guidelines are strictly followed.

Evaluation and Management Guidelines Overview

There are two guidelines for coding an evaluation and management service: 1995 and 1997. Either guideline is permissible to use from visit to visit; however, use only one guideline during an individual visit because there are subtle, yet important, differences in each style.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

History documentation: Under the 1995 guidelines, a provider is allowed to document the status of three or more chronic or inactive issues to reach an extended level for the History of Present Illness, while the 1997 version requires at least four of the eight elements of the illness to be documented:

  1. Location
  2. Severity
  3. Timing
  4. Modifying factors
  5. Quality
  6. Duration
  7. Context
  8. Associated signs and symptoms

Examination documentation: At first glance, the 1995 version appears to have easier and less tedious documentation requirements, but a practice can leave itself open to an auditor’s interpretation of what is documented. The 1997 version is very specific and rigid in its requirements for documentation. It is broken down into the different organ systems, and each system is broken down by bulleted sections that must be met in order for that organ to count as being examined.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

MDM Documentation: Medical decision making (MDM) is the driving force to establish the medical necessity of a visit, and both versions have the same guidelines.

Carrier Medical Policy Resources

First and foremost, coding and billing staff must know which E/M style—1995 or 1997—is being used in the documentation so that the service is billed correctly.

Secondly, staff must know how the insurance carrier requires a serviced to be billed. This information can be found in the medical policy on the carrier’s website. These policies should not contradict coding guidelines. Carriers usually provide online articles and payment policies to give additional information on medical policies.

The three main areas of a medical policy to review are:

  • Diagnoses (e.g., codes to support the medical necessity of the service);
  • Frequency guidelines (e.g., monthly, every other year, allowed three times a year); and
  • Patient specifications (e.g., weight, sex, age).

Types of Audits

A provider can be audited by a private carrier, Medicare carrier, or a federal entity. It is important to know who is auditing your practice because there are different time constraints issued by the type of carrier that is performing the audit.

  • Private carriers will typically farm out auditing work to third-party auditing firms. Your staff should always verify who is actually requesting records if it is not clear.
  • Medicare carriers can audit a practice in many ways. Here are examples of the different types of audits:
    • Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT)—CERT audit contractors will audit procedures that have been flagged as having high rates of improper payments.
    • Recovery Audit Contractors (RAC)—RAC only assess overpayments or underpayments and look at coding and billing guidelines such as frequency or units.
    • Zone Program Integrity Contractors (ZPIC)—ZPIC audits are fee-based audits. This means they are looking at unusual billing patterns. If your practice receives a notice of a ZPIC audit, there is a suspicion of fraud.
  • Office of Inspector General (OIG)—The OIG’s function is to supervise and guard the integrity of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) programs as well as protect the beneficiaries of these programs. This federal office will audit a practice when there is any suspicion of fraud from both private and federal healthcare plans.

Coding Guidelines Resources

  • Current coding manuals—CPT, ICD-9, and HCPCS—are coders’ main resources. For in-depth information about these manuals and the anatomy of their codes, refer to The Rheumatologist article, “The Anatomy of Coding” (June 2011, p. 17).
  • ACR Rheumatology Coding Manual—an adjunct rheumatology-specific guide to the AMA’s CPT manual that provides an overview of the codes most applicable to rheumatology practices as well as their effective and appropriate use.

If you have any additional questions concerning coding or billing guidelines contact Melesia Tillman at (404) 633-3777, ext. 820, or [email protected].

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingFrom the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:AuditsBillingCodingmedical documentationMedicarePractice Management

Related Articles

    Different Payer Audits Require Different Preparation & Response

    June 21, 2018

    For a provider of healthcare services, payer audits are always a possibility. Both government and private payers consistently monitor providers to prevent fraud, overpayment, and improper billing or coding procedures. Audits can be nerve-racking and intimidating, even if a provider is billing correctly. Improper billing can lead to civil and criminal sanctions. To alleviate some…

    What Rheumatologists Need to Know about Payer Audits

    March 15, 2016

    Both government and private payers continue to aggressively monitor providers to prevent and recover overpayments. This is evidenced by the fact that the number of audits conducted in recent years has increased dramatically. A negative audit finding can result in the need to repay five- or seven-figure amounts. Types of Audits Private Payer Audits Private…

    Clinical Documentation Improvement Programs Can Protect Physicians

    August 1, 2014

    CDI programs can validate patient care, support accurate coding practices, evidence-based care for quality-reporting measures

    Phase 2 of HIPAA Audit Program Launches

    May 13, 2016

    With many competing priorities facing physician practices, HIPAA compliance and security is not a topic that usually makes it to the top of the list. But this is not the case with the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office for Civil Rights (OCR), because it has initiated a new phase of audits of physician…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences