The Rheumatologist
COVID-19 News
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
      • Gout Resource Center
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Resource Centers
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis Resource Center
    • Gout Resource Center
    • Psoriatic Arthritis Resource Center
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
    • Interprofessional Perspective
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
    • From the College
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • ACR Convergence
      • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
      • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
      • Gout Resource Center
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence Home
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Research Reviews
    • ACR Journals
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Image Library
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Events
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / Coding Corner Answer: Evaluation & Management Documentation Quiz

Coding Corner Answer: Evaluation & Management Documentation Quiz

July 19, 2018 • By From the College

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF

Take the challenge.

You Might Also Like
  • Coding Corner Question: Evaluation & Management Documentation Quiz
  • Coding Corner Answer: Evaluation and Management
  • Rheumatology Coding Answer: Deconstructing Evaluation and Management Codes
Explore This Issue
July 2018
Also By This Author
  • Help Find a Cure for RA
  1. B—The presenting problem(s) is what is evaluated during the history and examination by the provider. The chief complaint is in the patient’s own words or is a follow-up for his or her current condition. The history of present illness, along with the review of systems, usually guides the provider through the examination. Depending on the significance of the problem(s), it leads the provider to decide on the assessment and treatment plan for that date of service. For example, the current issue could give reason for the provider to order tests or request notes from another physician. The problem could also determine what type of prescription plan management the patient may need. This is one reason why the presenting problem usually drives the medical necessity of the level of E/M service.
  2. B—False. Medical decision making is just one component of an E/M visit. It plays a key part in medical necessity, along with the presenting problem, for that date of service. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) defines it as:
    • Medical necessity of a service is the overarching criterion for payment in addition to the individual requirement of a CPT code. It would not be medically necessary or appropriate to bill a higher level E/M service when a lower level of service is warranted. The volume of documentation should not be the primary influence upon which a specific level of service is billed. Documentation should support the level of service reported.
  3. B—No. Even for an established patient, the requirement is two out of three for the history, examination and/or MDM. As mentioned in the answer for question one, the level of the visit would depend on the presenting problem, assessment and treatment plan. The comprehensive history and examination must be supported by medical necessity.
  4. B—The examination is the difference between the 1995 and the 1997 documentation guidelines for E/M visits. The 1995 documentation guidelines are very ambiguous. The provider only has to meet one element of the organ system or body area examined, while the 1997 guidelines consist of elements identified by bullets. For 1997, each bullet has specific instructions that must be completed to count for that bullet, because there are key components within some of the elements. For example, to qualify for one of the bullets for constitution, at least three out of the seven signs must be met. Each organ system has its own examination that contains different ways to meet the bullets. Adding up all the bullets will determine the level of visit for the examination.
  5. D—All of the above. The documentation of a visit tells the story of why the patient was seen in the practice; what the provider found during the examination; what the assessment was, the clinical impression and the number and severity of the problems; and finally what the provider’s treatment plan for that patient is.

For questions or additional information on coding and documentation guidelines, contact Melesia Tillman, CPC-I, CPC, CRHC, CHA, via email at [email protected] or call 404-633-3777 x820.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Billing/Coding, From the College, Practice Management Tagged With: Billing & CodingIssue: July 2018

You Might Also Like:
  • Coding Corner Question: Evaluation & Management Documentation Quiz
  • Coding Corner Answer: Evaluation and Management
  • Rheumatology Coding Answer: Deconstructing Evaluation and Management Codes
  • Rheumatology Coding Corner Answer: Querying Documentation for Correct Billing

ACR Convergence

Don’t miss rheumatology’s premier scientific meeting for anyone involved in research or the delivery of rheumatologic care or services.

Visit the ACR Convergence site »

Meeting Abstracts

Browse and search abstracts from the ACR Convergence and ACR/ARP Annual Meetings going back to 2012.

Visit the Abstracts site »

American College of Rheumatology

Visit the official website for the American College of Rheumatology.

Visit the ACR »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2022 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)