The Rheumatologist
COVID-19 News
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
      • Gout Resource Center
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Resource Centers
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis Resource Center
    • Gout Resource Center
    • Psoriatic Arthritis Resource Center
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
    • Interprofessional Perspective
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
    • From the College
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • ACR Convergence
      • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
      • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
      • Gout Resource Center
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence Home
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Research Reviews
    • ACR Journals
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Image Library
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Events
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / How to Document the Physical Exam

How to Document the Physical Exam

July 19, 2018 • By From the College

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF
Kamon_Wongnon / shutterstock.com

Kamon_Wongnon / shutterstock.com

The adage frequently cited in healthcare settings, “If it isn’t documented, it wasn’t done,” still rings true for the key components required in a patient’s medical record. The note in the medical record must sufficiently describe all of the services furnished to patients on a specific date.

You Might Also Like
  • Coding Corner Answer: Coding Scenario for 1997 Musculoskeletal Exam
  • Coding Corner Answer: Evaluation & Management Documentation Quiz
  • Rheumatology Fellow Questions Diagnostic Utility of Patient Physical Exam
Explore This Issue
July 2018
Also By This Author
  • Reminder: MIPS Reporting Deadline Is April 2

The essential requirements to appropriately bill a claim and ultimately have it properly adjudicated involve reasonable documentation that the service(s) validate the medical necessity and appropriateness of the diagnostic and/or therapeutic services provided.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The examination usually occurs after the provider obtains the chief complaint and history of present illness—the reason the patient is in the office, whether it’s a follow-up visit or to address an acute problem. Because the examination will be dictated by the patient’s complaint, it is safe to assume the exam could involve a single organ system, several organs and/or several areas. For example, if a patient presents with elbow pain, the provider would focus predominantly on examining the elbow and the arm to determine the extent of the paint. This enables the provider to base his/her judgment on what these findings are and how to treat. Keep in mind that one area of concern does not necessarily require a complete head-to-toe exam and should be determined on the basis of the findings. A head-to-toe examination is just that, depending on the severity of symptoms presented. A comprehensive exam requires a head-to-toe examination of the ears, eyes, nose, abdomen and extremities. All exams would need to be performed and documented.

Unlike the components of history and medical decision making, the rules defining the various levels of physical exam differ; two sets of guidelines exist—those from 1995 and those from 1997. The 1995 evaluation and management (E/M) guidelines allow the physician to complete the physical exam by documenting organ systems or body areas, which can be subjective but allows providers more leeway and “wiggle room.” On the other hand, the 1997 E/M guidelines are relatively rigid and force providers to document using more specificity through a bullet system. But the 1997 examination rules are much more black and white—either the bullets are there or they aren’t.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The levels of E/M services are based on four types of examination defined as follows:

  • Problem Focused—A limited examination of the affected body area or organ system.
  • Expanded Problem Focused—A limited examination of the affected body area or organ system and other symptomatic or related organ system(s).
  • Detailed—An extended examination of the affected body area(s) and other symptomatic or related organ system(s).
  • Comprehensive—A general multisystem examination or complete examination of a single organ system.

1995 E/M Guidelines Examination Rules

For the purpose of documenting an examination using the 1995 guidelines, the following body areas are recognized:

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Billing/Coding, From the College, Practice Management Tagged With: Billing & Coding, Documentation, physical examIssue: July 2018

You Might Also Like:
  • Coding Corner Answer: Coding Scenario for 1997 Musculoskeletal Exam
  • Coding Corner Answer: Evaluation & Management Documentation Quiz
  • Rheumatology Fellow Questions Diagnostic Utility of Patient Physical Exam
  • NGS Updates E/M Coding Requirements for Examination Component

American College of Rheumatology

Visit the official website for the American College of Rheumatology.

Visit the ACR »

ACR Convergence

Don’t miss rheumatology’s premier scientific meeting for anyone involved in research or the delivery of rheumatologic care or services.

Visit the ACR Convergence site »

Meeting Abstracts

Browse and search abstracts from the ACR Convergence and ACR/ARP Annual Meetings going back to 2012.

Visit the Abstracts site »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2022 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.