Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Colin Edgerton, MD, Testifies in Congressional Hearing on Biosimilars

Vanessa Caceres  |  April 21, 2025

Colin Edgerton, MD, sits at a wooden table speaking.

Dr. Edgerton testifying in front of the Ways and Means Subcommittee on April 8, 2025.

On April 8, rheumatologist and ACR Board of Directors member Colin Edgerton, MD, FACP, RhMSUS, testified before the U.S. House of Representatives Ways and Means Health Subcommittee to address challenges with biosimilars.

Although biosimilars were brought to the market as lower-cost alternatives to biologics, pharmaceutical companies have received pressure from insurers and pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to offer rebates for preferred formulary placement.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

During the hearing, “Lowering Costs for Patients: The Health of the Biosimilar Market,” Dr. Edgerton’s testimony addressed how these rebates result in provider reimbursement at rates lower than their acquisition cost. Dr. Edgerton, of Articularis Healthcare in Charleston, S. C., is a former chair of the ACR’s Committee on Rheumatologic Care.

“The gap between the cost of acquiring biosimilar treatments for administration to patients and the amount we are reimbursed upon administering those treatments is negatively impacting both physician practices and access to care for millions of patients suffering from chronic diseases,” Dr. Edgerton told the subcommittee members.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“If the reimbursement does not cover the acquisition cost of the biosimilar, physicians will be operating at a financial loss. This leads to unsustainable practice economics, especially in high-volume settings, such as rheumatology, where biologics are a central part of patient care,” Dr. Edgerton testified.

The rebates are factored into the manufacturers’ quarterly average sales price (ASP) reported to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), artificially lowering the ASP such that many providers’ acquisition costs substantially exceeded Medicare and other private health plan payments.

Dr. Edgerton, who is a former U.S. Army physician, pointed out that these financial strains are coupled with record inflation and nearly annual reimbursement cuts in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule.

“As a result, medical practices may face the choice of either reducing services, refusing certain patients or even closing due to financial stress,” he said.

In Search of Solutions

In response to these challenges, he noted, the ACR and the Coalition of State Rheumatology Organizations are co-leading the Underwater Biosimilars Coalition to support legislation for one of the following:

  • Amend Section 1847(b) of the Social Security Act to temporarily provide an 8% add-on to the providers’ acquisition cost of all biosimilar products;
  • Amend Section 1847A(c)(4) to extend the Secretary’s authority to use wholesale acquisition cost + 3% until the ASP reaches sustainable levels; or
  • Amend Section 1847A(c)(3) to permanently remove manufacturer rebates from the ASP methodology for biosimilars.

Dr. Edgerton said he felt honored to be called to testify and was pleased that subcommittee members had an understanding of the formulary restrictions primarily promulgated by PBMs. However, he still had some concerns.

“It was frustrating to see some of the D.C. political maneuvering,” Dr. Edgerton says. “Although the patient access and cost savings potential of biosimilars should be a bipartisan issue, the Democrat members of the committee did not focus on the topic of the committee meeting, but instead talked off-topic on their opposition to the current administration’s funding cuts to various government agencies. This was not in keeping with the testimony or expertise of the witnesses,” he notes.

The hearing also included testimonies from Debra Pratt, MD, a breast cancer oncologist in Austin, Texas, and president of the Community Oncology Alliance; Craig Burton, executive director of the Biosimilars Council, which is a division of the Association for Accessible Medicines; and Aaron Kesselheim, MD, professor of medicine at Harvard University and director of the Program On Regulation, Therapeutics, And Law (PORTAL) Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics in the Department of Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston.

More information about the hearing and a video of the proceedings are available online.


Vanessa Caceres is a medical writer in Bradenton, Fla.

Share: 

Filed under:InsuranceLegislation & Advocacy Tagged with:BiosimilarsWays and Means Committee

Related Articles

    Marching to the Biosimilar Beat: Questions on Rollout Remain

    September 7, 2023

    The availability of biosimilars for the treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases exploded in 2023. Here’s where we stand and what to expect going forward.

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    The Biosimilars Debate Heats Up: Potential cost savings weighed against patient health & safety

    March 1, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    Possible Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab on U.S. Market in Prescriptions, Pricing

    September 8, 2016

    The use of biosimilars for rheuma­tology in the U.S. became a reality when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), a biosimilar to Remicade (infliximab), in April. What this may mean is increased competition among drug companies with regard to pricing and, therefore, potentially lower costs for U.S. patients, according to Seoyoung…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences