Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Congressional Action Needed to Maintain Medicare’s Extended Telehealth Services

From the College  |  Issue: October 2024  |  September 10, 2024

If Congress does not act before the end of 2024, the CMS is not authorized to continue to cover Medicare’s extended telehealth services beyond the end of this year, except when the patient lives in a “rural area” as specifically defined by statute. No one in the healthcare community or Congress wants to see this happen: 74% of physicians work in a practice offering telehealth, and telehealth services are especially critical in mental health care, which continues to be top of mind for many policymakers. For these reasons, the ACR expects the issue is mainly a matter of hammering out the policy and budget specifics in the very narrow window left before the 118th Congress ends Dec. 31.

Continued access to telehealth services is a priority for the Washington, D.C.-based ACR advocacy team as well as the broader medical community. More legislation has been introduced on this policy topic than any other that we are tracking this Congress; everyone wants a hand in bringing telehealth into the next phase. The hold-up has been the cost to Medicare. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) scored a two-year extension of the current flexibilities at $2 billion per year, based on estimated increases in the use of Medicare services. 

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Even with this price tag, Congress is unlikely to let telehealth access expire. However, legislators will likely wait until after the election so none of their political opponents can use the cost of the package (and its “addition to the deficit”) against them in November.

After this likely two-year extension, we hope the CBO will use the additional years of non-COVID data to reassess how much telehealth costs Medicare. We think more data will show telehealth saves the system money, because it has reduced costly emergency room visits and introduced other savings that make it practical permanent policy. A lower CBO score would allow a future Congress to pass a longer extension of the current telehealth flexibilities.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

To support extending telehealth flexibilities, visit the ACR’s legislative action center campaign on this topic and send messages to your members of Congress. Such direct communications are particularly important in election years.

Share: 

Filed under:Legislation & Advocacy Tagged with:ACR advocacytelehealth

Related Articles

    Charting a New Course Post-PHE

    May 23, 2023

    The public health emergency (PHE), in place since 2020, officially expired at midnight on May 11. The PHE declaration allowed significant flexibility in the healthcare system. The end of the PHE impacts several policies, including changes in Medicare and Medicaid policies. What do these changes mean for providers?

    Telehealth Brings Opportunities to Enhance Patient Care

    December 8, 2022

    During an ACR webinar in August, presenters discussed multiple aspects of telehealth in rheumatology, especially related to rheumatology fellowship training. They agreed that although telehealth represents one potential avenue to improve patient access to treatment for rheumatic disease, we must keep identifying the best ways to employ telehealth to enhance care. Impact of Pandemic Telemedicine…

    What’s Next for Telehealth after the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency?

    June 10, 2023

    Do you remember where you were when the COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (PHE) was declared on Jan. 31, 2020? While it may seem like yesterday, you would be forgiven for not recalling your exact location over three years ago during what felt like an incredible whirlwind for the healthcare industry. One possible location you may…

    Telerheumatology: What’s Next?

    December 17, 2020

    In an ACR Convergence session, two rheumatologists discussed how COVID-19 changed the use of telemedicine, how payers reacted and which changes are likely permanent and which are likely to be temporary.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences