Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Data-Driven, Optimal Patient Care and Clinical Research

James R. O'Dell, MD  |  Issue: January 2012  |  January 13, 2012

James R. O’Dell, MD

Regardless of all the uncertainty in the current healthcare environment, one thing is clear: demonstrating quality patient care by adhering to guidelines and best practices and using data to monitor and improve gaps in patient care and outcomes will continue to increase in significance. Quality improvement initiatives have received bipartisan support and have been pervasive in both Republican and Democratic administrations. Irrespective of whether the Supreme Court determines parts of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to be unconstitutional, the ideas built into the current quality programs were prevalent long before the ACA and have already gained considerable momentum and will only increase in importance.

ACR’s Registry Efforts

For the past several years, the ACR has been working to help the rheumatology provider community become better prepared to demonstrate the high-quality care our members deliver to patients with rheumatic disease. One of the most valuable tools the ACR has developed to help members implement quality initiatives and meet national quality reporting program requirements is the Rheumatology Clinical Registry (RCR).

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The RCR is a free, easy-to-use tool developed to assist members in practice improvement, local population management, and efficient, successful participation in national quality programs. The RCR integrates evidence-based quality measures aimed at improving care and drug safety for patients with rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, gout, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

To date, more than 600 members have entered data on more than 18,000 patients into the RCR. The ACR has established the RCR as a highly successful means of reporting data to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) program, and both PQRS and CMS e-Prescribing reporting are available using the RCR in 2012. Approximately 90% of rheumatologists who use the RCR for PQRS reporting in 2009 received their incentive payments, which is well above the approximately 60% average across all specialties and PQRS reporting mechanisms. A new feature of the RCR is the ability for the clinician to generate a report that will assess whether quality-reporting requirements are met and allow RCR users to make changes to ensure a successful submission. This feature should further increase successful PQRS reporting.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The RCR is also an excellent tool for completing quality-improvement modules for maintenance of certification. There are 48 rheumatoid arthritis measures incorporated into the RCR that can be used for American Board of Internal Medicine performance improvement requirements. The ACR also recently integrated its Assess Improve Measure (AIM) program into the RCR, so users can more seamlessly use the RCR for maintenance of certification and to perform quality-improvement projects in their practice.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Drug UpdatesEMRsInformation TechnologyLegislation & AdvocacyPractice SupportPresident's PerspectiveProfessional TopicsQuality Assurance/ImprovementResearch RheumTechnologyTechnology Tagged with:AC&RACAAdvocacyAffordable Care Act (ACA)American College of Rheumatology (ACR)drugelectronic health recordLegislationMedicarepatient carePQRSPractice ManagementResearchrheumatologistSafetyTechnology

Related Articles

    Registries and Rheumatology Quality

    June 1, 2010

    The RCR has short- and long-term benefits for the subspecialty

    PQRS Reporting Critical for Rheumatologists to Avoid Penalty, Earn Incentive Payment

    November 1, 2013

    The ACR’s Rheumatology Clinical Registry can help physicians meet reporting requirements of the Physicians Quality Reporting System

    Rheumatology Clinical Registry Debuts This Month

    June 1, 2009

    Web-based system will ease compliance with PQRI, benchmarking, research

    I Have the Data—Now What?

    April 1, 2010

    Rheumatologists practicing in the current healthcare environment are experiencing unprecedented information flow, data management issues, and a rise in quality designations and pay-for-performance incentive programs. There is increasing pressure on rheumatologists to document or capture treatment concordance with guideline recommendations and best practices and to monitor gaps in care and patient outcomes. Unfortunately, some quality programs are not considered clinically meaningful, and even those that are often bring administrative burdens related to reporting, data aggregation, and analysis.

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences