Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Design Thinking & The Rheumatologist

Bharat Kumar, MD, MME, FACP, FAAAAI, RhMSUS  |  Issue: October 2023  |  October 11, 2023

If you’ve been a long-time reader  of The Rheumatologist, you may have noticed that things look just a little different in this issue. The logo has changed, the font appears distinct, and the bylines are, for lack of a better term, aligned differently. If you’re looking at this online, the menus have changed somewhat, and the background looks less like it was made in the 1990s. All of this resulted from the work of a large, interdisciplinary team over the course of a year. As a member of that team, I’ve been privileged to see how things are designed, often with a fine-toothed comb and a critical eye toward enhancing the reader experience.

Throughout this process, I’ve been impressed by the thought that the world around is a product of what we design it to be. It’s not only fonts and figures that are crafted—often meticulously—but the entire scope of our civilization. Even as I drive around my home of Iowa City, I see products of design, such as the tiny details on roadside signs and elegant curves on the guardrails. As I open my laptop, I see the personable “We’re working on updates” screen, followed by a desktop full of eye-catching icons. And, in my own clinic, I’m suddenly observing the patterns on the carpet that gently steer people to their rooms and the lighting schema that seems to make things look calmer.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

All of these things have made me dive deep into the art and science of design, and prompted me to explore an entirely underutilized paradigm of clinical science: the design-thinking process. How can these insights be specifically applied to the world of rheumatology? Let’s rheuminate.

A Quick Primer

Design thinking seems to have started in the 1940s, based on the nascent science of organizational behavior and psychology.1 In particular, psychologists started to focus on creativity and how creativity can be fostered to solve real-world problems.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Hybridizing with many other fields, such as architecture, engineering, computer science, marketing, anthropology and philosophy, design thinking began to seep in the world of business management. It became “a method of creative action.”2 Design thinkers pioneered and elaborated on several concepts that seem embedded into our everyday world today—things like ergonomics, wicked problems and brainstorming. It also introduced irksome jargon, terms that have lost much of their original meanings, such as think outside the box, touch base, paradigm shift and synergy.3

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:OpinionRheuminations Tagged with:DiagnosisEmpathy

Related Articles

    The Science of Empathy in Rheumatology

    January 19, 2021

    Rheumatology has arguably benefited like no other field from the proliferation of an increasingly effective pipeline of therapeutics. These medications have dramatically raised the bar for clinical outcomes for our patients in a way that we could not have envisioned a short generation ago. With such therapeutic progress now reaching a widening circle of rheumatic…

    Janusian Thinking in Rheumatology

    January 17, 2023

    Happy New Year, readers of The Rheumatologist! As the incoming editor, I want to welcome you back in this new year and hope that you’ll stick around, month after month, as we journey together through 2023. As the year progresses, you may notice some departures from what we have previously done, but I also wish…

    Mitigate Risk and Increase Success of Lupus Clinical Trials

    August 1, 2010

    Design strategies from a Lupus Research Institute conference

    Letter: Empathy in Medicine

    April 17, 2021

    For years now, I have read The Rheumatologist cover to cover (but only glance at the ads, but don’t tell the advertisers that). Len Calabrese’s piece, “The Science of Empathy in Rheumatology” in the January 2021 issue, hits the central point in medical care. I would like to believe that it has been empathy that…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences