Video: Knock on Wood| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Lupus Nephritis
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Drug Diversion Concerns on the Rise

Kurt Ullman  |  Issue: September 2012  |  September 5, 2012

The diversion of medications from legitimate channels has increased as drug costs rise for both legitimate and illegitimate users. This, in turn, has resulted in more opportunities to obtain and sell diverted drugs through e-commerce and global trading channels. Although the diversion of narcotics and other controlled prescription medications have been getting much of the attention, there are many other ways that medications leave the legitimate supply chain.

“Diversion is when a pharmaceutical product is illegally transferred from one market to another,” says Sebastian J. Mollo, MD, intelligence director for the Americas at the Pharmaceutical Security Institute in Vienna, Va. “This can take many forms such as smuggling from one country to another or when transferred from institutional markets, such as Medicaid or Medicare, to the private market through fraud or illegal claim.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Three Areas

This tends to break down into legitimate trade, gray market trade, and illegal trade. The first is where the manufacturer of a product hands it off to a known wholesaler or distributor who then gets it to the final customer. For the entire time, it is under the control of regulated and vetted entities that make sure it is not adulterated, it is stored properly, and there is a high degree of certainty that the patient is getting a genuine product that is still efficacious.

“The gray market includes legitimate product, but you can’t be certain how it was handled during distribution,” says David Kent, vice-president and head of security at Sanofi North America, Cambridge, Mass. “It might have left the legitimate supply chain by any number of means and now is in the hands of the patient. You don’t know for sure if proper temperature, humidity, or other factors that impact efficacy have been maintained.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The third arm is illegal trade. This can take many forms, such as the counterfeiting of medications or the diversion and selling of narcotic drugs.

DEA and FDA Involvement

The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) look at different parts of the diversion problem. Under their enabling legislation, the DEA enforces the Controlled Substances Act and deals mainly with scheduled medications with varying potentials for abuse that are removed from the legitimate supply chain. The FDA is tasked by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act to grant premarket approval to all drugs based on a demonstration of safety and efficacy for the intended indication, as well as to ensure compliance with federal regulatory standards for manufacturing quality, purity, and potency of all approved medications.

The FDA has estimated that medications with a value of around $700 million entered the United States from Canada alone in 2003, and an equivalent amount may be entering from the rest of the world.1

FDA Mission Is Drug Safety

For medications that are not controlled substances, the FDA is the lead agency. Although the DEA and Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) deal largely with the illegal use of drugs, the FDA’s mission is drug safety.

“The FDA cannot ensure the safety and effectiveness of products that are not FDA approved and come from unknown sources and foreign locations, or that may not have been manufactured under proper conditions,” says Sarah Clark-Lynn, a spokesperson from the FDA’s Office of Public Affairs. “These unknowns put a patient at risk if they cannot be sure of the product’s identity, purity, and source.”

One of the concerns in this area is counterfeit or fake medicine. It may be contaminated or contain the wrong or no active ingredient. They could have the right ingredient but at less-than-therapeutic or even fatal doses. Medications can also degrade if not stored and transported in compliance with established standards.

Misbranding is also a problem. This occurs when the labeling on the medication does not correspond to the requirements of the law. It ranges from a type size that is too small to improper directions for taking the drug.

“Just because medications have been approved by another country’s regulators does not automatically mean they are okay for use in this country,” says Dr. Mollo. “For example, the U.S. has high standards for bioequivalency in generic medications. It can be legal in one country and still not acceptable for use in this one.”

HHS Also Has Concerns

The Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the HHS is another group that may be involved in drug diversion if the scam includes payment from either Medicare or Medicaid.

“We are brought in when the medication is paid for using funds from Medicare or Medicaid sources,” says Ryan Lynch, assistant special-agent-in-charge of the Office of Investigations at the OIG’s Tampa office. “Sometimes, the patient obtains the medications using a legitimate prescription and then sells them on the street. In other instances, there may be collusion between the patient, doctor, and/or their pharmacy.”

The OIG looks for certain indicators that the physician knows the diversion is taking place. Among these are charging of exorbitant fees of as much as $500 for a routine visit or for multiple services that they did not render.

“The take away is that as long as prescriptions are written in good faith based upon an examination of the patient and if the doctor has established a legitimate medical purpose, there is no reason for concern,” says Lynch.

Diversion Occurs All Along Supply Chain

“Diversion can happen at so many places along the chain,” says Rusty Payne, a spokesman for the DEA drug diversion program in Washington, D.C. “People think it is just a doctor issue or a pharmacy issue, but it is that and much more.”

Specific to the diversion of narcotics, it can take the form of patients who “doc shop,” pharmacy theft, and stolen prescription pads. Payne notes that around 70% of all abusers get their pills from friends or family.

He also stresses that the focus of the diversion project is not to stand between the patient and needed pain help. Much of their work involves inadequate record keeping and is dealt with administratively.

“It is important to understand that the laws are also there to protect the physician,” he notes. “We are law enforcers and do not get involved in legitimate doctor/patient relationships or decisions made about medical treatments.”

If physicians think there may be diversion problems occurring in their practice, they can contact the area DEA office and ask for the Office of Diversion Control. They can also visit www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov or call 1-800-882-9539.

Some of the signs of drug abuse and possible diversion of narcotics include:

  • Demanding immediate attention;
  • Having an unusually deep knowledge of controlled substances;
  • Frequently giving a medical history with textbook symptoms or a vague medical history;
  • Often will have no family doctor or health insurance;
  • Will often request a specific drug and is reluctant to take or says they have an allergy to other options;
  • Failing to keep appointments for further diagnostic tests or refusing to see another specialist;
  • Cutaneous signs of abuse such as track marks or related scars on the body;
  • Having to be seen right away, often near the end of or after normal office hours; and
  • Needing a replacement for a prescription that has been lost or stolen.2

Physician Interventions

Brian Daikh, MD, is a private practice physician with Rheumatology Associates in Portland, Maine. In his personal practice, he uses a patient contract to address diversion issues.

“With a contract, patients agree to get their pain medications from only one physician,” he says. “I also require that they use no nonprescription medications, such as marijuana or cocaine, and will drug test randomly if I suspect abuse. If there is evidence of a breach I would stop prescribing to them, and I have fired patients from my practice.”

There is also an important patient-teaching piece. He will often suggest that patients put their pain medications in a locked cabinet to cut down on the possibility of theft. Another tip is to make sure those medications are kept out of visual range of visitors.

Evaluating Sources

For the physician, there are certain things to look for when evaluating sources for medication supply. First is whether or not the potential vendor is licensed by the appropriate federal and state authorities. If there are doubts, contact the maker of the medication to confirm that you are dealing with an established source of the company’s product.

Other indicators include:

  • Packaging materials in a nonexpected language;
  • Spelling or grammatical errors on the insert or the outside packaging;
  • Package in poor condition;
  • Seals that are not intact; and
  • A look, color, and consistency of the product that is inconsistent with what you have seen previously.

“Price should be another red flag,” notes Kent. “There is a reason that these drugs are being sold so cheaply. They are not having to pay the costs associated with a regulated supply chain that produces a secure product.”

For the physician-administered medications, there are liability concerns that accrue when buying medications outside normal channels.

“It is a very high-risk activity,” says Dr. Mollo. “It brings exposure to malpractice if the medication is adulterated or the wrong strength. There is also the potential for criminal liability when submitting payment claims if products are not approved for use in the U.S.”

Medication Samples

Diverting medication samples sits at the cusp of legal and illegal uses. On the one hand, samples obtained from the pharmaceutical company or their proxies most often flows through legitimate markets. On the other, selling medications obtained for free constitutes fraud when paid for by Medicare, Medicaid, or insurance companies.

The rise of mail-order and Internet-based sources for medications has further muddied the waters, especially when patients are involved. Although many of these advertise cheap medicines, it is very much a buyer-beware endeavor.

“The FDA advises consumers to use caution when buying prescription medicines online as many websites that appear to reputable and similar to legitimate retail pharmacies actually operate from outside the United States,” says Clark-Lynn. “It is very easy for these online resellers to pretend to be from Canada or another country when they are really operating from the far reaches of the globe. Although a country may have a strong regulatory process, U.S. consumers cannot rely on the fact that the products they are buying have been approved in that country.”

Internet and Mail-Order Sources

The experts agree that the Internet sites of established national, regional, and local pharmacies are as safe as their brick-and-mortar affiliates. A person can also confidently use mail-order outlets of these companies and any mail-order pharmacies endorsed by their insurance companies.

“Being about a six-hour drive from the Canadian border, we do have patients who get medications from there, primarily because of the lower costs,” says Dr. Daikh. “Although I really don’t have evidence, I think someone physically going to Canada and buying from a licensed pharmacy is more likely to be purchasing from a reliable source.”

However, he does have “a lot of discomfort” when patients tell him they are getting their medications over the Internet or by mail.

The FDA recommends that physicians suggest to their patients that they buy only from pharmacies that are located in the U.S. and are licensed by the state board of pharmacy where the pharmacy is operating. The pharmacy should require a prescription from a physician or other appropriately licensed practitioner before sending the medications. Finally, it should provide contact information that allows the consumer to talk to a pharmacist if they have problems or questions. Additional information about buying prescription drugs over the Internet can be found online at www.fda.gov/Drugs/ResourcesForYou/Consumers/BuyingUsingMedicineSafely/Buying MedicinesOvertheInternet/default.htm.


Kurt Ullman is a freelance writer based in Indiana.

References

  1. Department of Health and Human Services. Report on prescription drug importation. Published December 2004. Available at archive.hhs.gov/importtaskforce/Report1220.pdf. Accessed July 6, 2012.
  2. Drug Enforcement Administration. “Don’t Be Scammed By A Drug Abuser.” Published December 1999. Available at www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/pubs/brochures/drugabuser.htm. Accessed May 14, 2012.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Multi-Page
Share: 

Filed under:Drug UpdatesLegislation & AdvocacyProfessional Topics Tagged with:drugLegislationMedicareMedicationpharmaceuticalrheumatologistSafety

Related Articles

    2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting: Rheumatology Drug Updates, Safety News

    January 1, 2015

    Plus, hydrocodone combination products and brodalumab

    U.S. Lets More Healthcare Workers Prescribe Opioid Addiction Treatment

    January 24, 2018

    WASHINGTON (Reuters)—The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration said on Tuesday it had changed a regulation to allow more healthcare professionals to prescribe a medication used to treat opioid addiction, opening up access in rural America where there are few doctors.1 Prior to 2000, only physicians could treat those with opioid addiction and had to register with…

    DEA Proposes Cutting Production of Come Opioids

    August 7, 2017

    (Reuters)—The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) on Friday proposed a 20% reduction in the manufacture of certain commonly prescribed opioid painkillers, as well as other controlled substances for next year. The proposal comes as U.S. regulators and lawmakers take steps to limit the supply of opioids—a class of drugs that include prescription painkillers and heroin—to…

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    Biosimilars are much bigger and more complex on the molecular level than small- molecule drugs. On the right is the small-molecule structure of aspirin (21 molecules). On the left is a monoclonal antibody made up of 10,000–20,000 molecules. The various biosimilar drugs depicted include monoclonal antibodies, scFv, Fab, and scFab, whereas the small-molecule drugs are…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
fa-facebookfa-linkedinfa-youtube-playfa-rss
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences