Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Elements of Medical Decision Making for Rheumatologists When Coding and Billing

Staff  |  Issue: November 2012  |  November 1, 2012

In May, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of the Inspector General reported that the level of evaluation and management (E/M) codes rose by 48% between 2001 and 2010, and the associated dollar amount increased as well, from $22.7 billion to $33.5 billion. This report opened the door for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) to launch audits for medical necessity of E/M services on a nationwide scale.

Many auditors believe that the MDM is what drives an E/M level. Getting to the final result of an encounter has many layers, which is why it is extremely important to document everything that is done during a visit. If it is not documented, it cannot be billed.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Documentation and Guidelines Overview

There are three parts to coding an E/M service—history, exam, and MDM—and two guidelines by which to code—1995 and 1997. Either guideline is permissible to use from visit to visit; however, use only one guideline during an individual visit because there are subtle, yet important, differences in each style.

History documentation: Under the 1995 guidelines, a provider is allowed to document the status of three or more chronic or inactive issues to reach an extended level for the history of present illness, while the 1997 version requires at least four of the eight elements of the illness to be documented:

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  1. Location
  2. Severity
  3. Timing
  4. Modifying factors
  5. Quality
  6. Duration
  7. Context
  8. Associated signs and symptoms

For more information on documenting a patient history, see “Documentation History in Evaluation and Management Services” in the January 2009 issue of The Rheumatologist (p. 7).

Examination documentation: At first glance, the 1995 version appears to have easier and less tedious documentation requirements, but a practice can leave itself open to an auditor’s interpretation of what is documented. The 1997 version is very specific and rigid in its requirements for documentation. It is broken down into the different organ systems, and each system is broken down by bulleted sections that must be met in order for that organ to count as being examined.

MDM documentation: MDM is the driving force to establish the medical necessity of a visit, and both versions have the same guidelines. MDM comprises three elements:

  1. Complexity of determining diagnoses or management options;
  2. Amount and/or complexity of data that needs to be reviewed; and
  3. Risk of complications and/or morbidity or mortality.

There are four levels of MDM: minimal, limited, multiple, and extensive. To qualify for a level of MDM, two of the three elements in Table 1 must be met.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Billing/CodingFrom the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:AC&RAmerican College of Rheumatology (ACR)BillingCodingE&MEvaluation and ManagementimagingMDMMedical decision makingPractice Managementrheumatologist

Related Articles

    Documentation Guidelines for Proper Medical Decision Making

    June 13, 2017

    The Medical Decision Making (MDM) of an evaluation and management (E/M) visit is one of the three components of determining the level of a patient’s visit. But the MDM can sometimes be the most difficult component, as this is where the provider’s thought process is quantified in deciding the correct level of E/M service. In the…

    Breaking Down Medical Decision Making

    June 1, 2010

    The medical decision making (MDM) of an evaluation and management visit is just one part of a patient’s visit. Rheumatologists can make the mistake of thinking that the level of visit can be determined just by the MDM, but that is often not the case.

    Coding Corner Answer: February Coding Challenge

    February 1, 2014

    Coding for an office visit by a patient with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis who is evaluated before starting a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor

    A New Era of Coding Evaluation & Management Services

    January 25, 2021

    After 25 years, the American Medical Association (AMA) Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) office and outpatient evaluation and management (E/M) codes received a major overhaul. These changes, which went into effect Jan. 1, will help reduce administrative burden on providers and roll back some of the rigid requirements for E/M coding by simplifying the code selection…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences