Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Envision Arthritis Pathology

Philip G. Conaghan, MB BS, PhD  |  Issue: April 2008  |  April 1, 2008

It is unclear which tissue should be the focus for clinical trials. Symptom-modifying trials do not require MRI, and—for structure modifying trials—the plethora of MRI OA pathology will need to be validated against meaningful clinical endpoints. Until the most important feature or features seen on MRI are defined, most studies should evaluate multiple features.

It has been difficult to accurately quantify noncartilage features of the knee, although image analysis methods are being explored. However, the need to understand the whole organ pathology has driven development of a number of semiquantitative scores.8 All divide the knee into multiple anatomical compartments and measure multiple features on variable ordinal scales within each compartment. Further development will be required in the use of all these scales, including the best ways to aggregate scores across compartments.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

MRI in OA Clinical Practice

At present, the role for MRI in OA clinical practice seems small. Osteoarthritis represents a syndrome of pain, functional loss, and reduced quality of life. Currently, the most important messages from MRI studies are the concepts we have learned. The whole organ nature was emphasized above, but MRI has also given us new clues on the sources of pain and a new understanding of the structural progression in OA. The most likely sources of pain appear to be the synovium and subchondral bone; both of these tissues are innervated, which adds validity to their importance. Bone marrow lesions and cartilage defects are associated with subsequent cartilage loss. The first real clinical use of MRI may be identifying patient subsets for targeted therapies, once these are available. Using MRI to determine meniscal pathology in the OA knee does not appear warranted. The major reason for doing so is if arthroscopy and debridement are required—a decision that should be made on clinical grounds of mechanical locking of the knee, not meniscal abnormality on MRI.

Conclusions

MRI is dramatically increasing our understanding of structural pathology in arthritis. In RA, we understand the links between inflammation and damage and can understand therapeutic response. MRI has provided excellent proof-of-concept tools that may move into clinical use. In OA, we are beginning to appreciate the extent of whole-organ pathology and have better tools to quantitate pathology, but more work is required to demonstrate relevant targets with clinically meaningful endpoints. Changes in MRI technology—especially in eMRI—may improve our day-to-day management of arthritis.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Dr. Conaghan is professor of musculoskeletal medicine at the University of Leeds (U.K.) and a consultant rheumatologist at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.

References

  1. Perry D, Stewart N, Benton N, et al. Detection of erosions in the rheumatoid hand; a comparative study of multidetector computerized tomography versus magnetic resonance scanning. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:256-267.
  2. Dohn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, Court-Payen M, et al. Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R110.
  3. Conaghan PG, O’Connor P, McGonagle D, et al. Elucidation of the relationship between synovitis and bone damage: a randomized magnetic resonance imaging study of individual joints in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:64-71.
  4. Jimenez-Boj E, Nobauer-Huhmann I, Hanslik-Schnabel B, et al. Bone erosions and bone marrow edema as defined by magnetic resonance imaging reflect true bone marrow inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;56:1118-1124.
  5. Ejbjerg BJ, Vestergaard A, Jacobsen S, Thomsen HS, Østergaard M. The smallest detectable difference and sensitivity to change of magnetic resonance imaging and radiographic scoring of structural joint damage in rheumatoid arthritis finger, wrist, and toe joints. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:2300-2306.
  6. Brown AK, Quinn MA, Karim Z, et al. Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3761-3773.
  7. Conaghan PG. Is MRI useful in osteoarthritis? Best Pract Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20:57-68.
  8. Eckstein F, Mosher T, Hunter D. Imaging of knee osteoarthritis: data beyond the beauty. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007;19:435-443.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsOsteoarthritis and Bone Disorders Tagged with:Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)MRIosteoarthritis (OA)PatheogenesisRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Related Articles

    Basics of Biologic Joint Reconstruction

    April 6, 2012

    For young patients especially, this can delay knee replacement and provide better outcomes.

    Imaging in Ankylosing Spondylitis

    April 1, 2015

    MRI inflammation, fat and new bone formation in the sacroiliac joints, spine in patients with AS

    Post-Traumatic Osteoarthritis: Managing OA That Develops After Joint Injuries & Reconstructive Surgery

    November 28, 2018

    CHICAGO—Joint trauma is one of many potential drivers of osteoarthritis disease activity and structural progression. In Post-Traumatic OA: Pathogenesis, Clinical Evolution and Management, a session at the 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, experts discussed the effects of sports and other injuries on even young patients’ joints. Post-traumatic osteoarthritis (OA) may account for 12% of hip, knee…

    New Therapeutics for Osteoarthritis May Be in Sight

    April 1, 2015

    Overview of OA pathogenesis, recent discoveries suggest new treatment strategies are possible

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences