Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Etanercept Biosimilars Promising in Clinical Studies

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  December 2, 2015

GENERIC_Drugs_500x270In a 52-week clinical study, an investigational biosimilar for etanercept, SB4, showed lasting efficacy (including radiographic progression), immunogenicity and safety.1 This trial was a randomized, double-blind study in adults with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA), despite methotrexate treatment.

Five hundred and ninety-six patients were randomized to receive either SB4 (n=299) or Enbrel (etanercept; ETN) (n=297). The ACR20 response rate was 81% in patients who received SB4 vs. 82% in those who received ETN. Additionally, the ACR50 and ACR70 response rates were slightly higher for SB4 compared with ETN.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The safety profiles were also comparable. One treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 59% of SB4-treated patients vs. 60% of ETN-treated patients; and injection-site reactions occurred in 4% vs. 18% of SB4- and ETN-treated patients, respectively (P<0.001). At Week 52, at least one anti-drug antibody result occurred in 1% and 13% of SB4- and ETN-treated patients, respectively (P<0.001). The serious infection, tuberculosis and malignancy rates were all comparable.

CHS-0214 is another investigational ETN biosimilar. The treatment met its primary endpoints in a confirmatory, double-blind, randomized, controlled, two-part Phase 3 study evaluating its efficacy and safety in patients with moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis.2 The efficacy endpoints were based on a 12-week assessment of Psoriasis Activity Severity Index (PASI) scores. The primary endpoints were the mean percent change in PASI from baseline and the proportion of patients achieving 75% improvement in PASI from baseline. These results met the pre-specified limits for demonstrating an equivalence to ETN. No clinically meaningful differences were noted in the safety profiles of the two products evaluated.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, CGP, RPh, is a freelance medical writer based in New York City and a pharmacist at New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital.

References

  1. Encovsky J, Sylwestrzak A, Leszczyñski P, et al. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind clinical study comparing SB4, an etanercept biosimilar, with etanercept reference product (Enbrel) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy (52-week results). Arthritis Rheumatol. 2015 Sep; 67(9, suppl 10).
  2. Coherus BioSciences Inc. New release: Coherus and Baxalta announce CHS-0214 (investigational etanercept biosimilar) met primary efficacy endpoints in phase 3 psoriasis clinical study (RaPsODY). 2015 Nov 10.

Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug Updates Tagged with:Biosimilarsetanerceptplaque psoriasisRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Related Articles

    Guselkumab Studied to Treat RA, Plaque Psoriasis

    September 15, 2015

    Guselkumab Studied to Treat RA & Plaque Psoriasis Guselkumab (GUS) is a subcutaneously administered monoclonal antibody that targets interleukin (IL) 23.1 It is being investigated in a Phase 2 study to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (PsA). On June 11, 2015, at the 2015 meeting of the European League Against…

    FDA Approves New Drugs for Pain

    January 19, 2016

    Image Credit: ajt/shutterstock.com FDA Updates Belbuca, buccal-administered buprenorphine, has received U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for treating severe chronic pain.1 The dosage form is a dissolving film that is absorbed through the inner lining of the cheek for chronic pain management. It’s expected to be commercially available in the first quarter of 2016….

    Biosimilar Drug Updates Reported from EULAR

    July 8, 2015

    At the 2015 meeting of the European League Against Rheumatism in June, multiple studies were presented comparing the use of different biosimilar and biologic drugs in treating rheumatoid arthritis…

    ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting 2012: Late-Breaking Abstracts Bring Newer Research to the Forefront

    January 1, 2013

    Studies addressing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) flares, a potential new drug for psoriatic arthritis, and a novel agent in the treatment of active RA are among the highlights

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences