Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Ethical, Regulatory Issues Raise Patient Care Dilemmas for Physical Therapists

Robert W. Richardson, PT MEd, FAPTA  |  Issue: February 2015  |  February 1, 2015

The dilemma facing the physical therapist is to choose between suboptimal care or risk a breach of regulations—and possibly incur a fine—to accommodate the patient’s needs. None of these options is ideal. Regardless of the choice made, documentation must be defensible and proper billing procedures must be in place.

The therapist might consider the following course of action:

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • Start by explaining the insurance limitations and promote the importance of a self-managed, home-treatment plan;
  • During the initial examination, offer instructions for a home program, stressing continued compliance, back safety and regular exercise;
  • Provide written instructions that guide progression of the individualized home program; and
  • Suggest available websites and other educational resources related to the identified impairments and offer follow-up phone consultation, as needed.

These actions are time consuming, but may prove helpful with regard to patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes.

Alternatives

In the future, physical therapists will need to use alternatives to traditional education methods, frequency and duration of care plans, and gaining compliance with home exercises to address the changing ethical, regulatory and financial environment.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Physical therapists are already looking to untraditional initiatives, such as telehealth, and promoting the use of technology, including smartphones and electronic communications, to assist in education and compliance efforts. However, payment for such services varies widely and usage is limited. Going forward, practitioners will need to provide Web-based links to quality educational resources and develop user-friendly educational tools to serve disadvantaged patients without adequate rehabilitation benefits.

When it comes to providing rehab services (and many other healthcare services) this version of the Golden Rule often applies: Those with the gold make the rules. Although this may be the unfortunate reality, exploring practical alternatives while balancing priorities and the needs of various stakeholders is essential to ensure the ethical delivery of patient care.


Robert W. Richardson, PT MEd, FAPTA, is a past president of the American Physical Therapy Association and a past president of the ARHP.

Additional Resources

APTA.org and CMS.gov are valuable resources for physical therapists. The following documents and publications can help you avoid fraud, waste and abuse, and gain an understanding of changing regulations.1-4,9

  • APTA Core Documents: www.apta.org/Policies/CoreDocuments features links to the Code of Ethics, Guide to Physical Therapist Practice and Guide for Conduct and Professionalism.
  • APTA Coding and Billing: www.apta.org/Payment/CodingBilling includes links to courses (also see http://learningcenter.apta.org and http://www.apta.org/Courses/Online/NavigatingCompliance).
  • Compliance: http://www.apta.org/Compliance offers information on fraud and abuse, and Medicare audits.
  • The federal government’s websites and the Federal Registry publish changes in rules and regulations that affect physical therapy. For example, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Medicare and Medicaid publishes documents that provide an overview of facts and laws regarding Medicare fraud and abuse. Changes are also published in other forms in the public record. Government websites can be useful, but be forewarned that most will induce sleep with a full dose.

References & Recommended Reading

  1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Regulations-and-Guidance.html.
  2. Medicare Claims Processing Manual. Chapter 5—Part B Outpatient Rehabilitation and CORF /OPT Services. http:www.cms.gov/Medicare/Billing/TherapyServices/downloads/clm104c05.pdf.
  3. Final 2015 Physician Fee Schedule and Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS) Measures. APTA Information Bulletin. October 2014.
  4. Code of ethics for the physical therapist. American Physical Therapy Association. http://www.apta.org.
  5. Purtillo RB, Doherty RF. Ethical Dimensions in the Health Professions, fifth ed. Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier: 2010.
  6. Scott R. Professional Ethics: A Guide for Rehabilitation Professionals. Mosby: 1998.
  7. Richardson JK. The challenging roles facing physical therapists. Healthc Trends Transit. 1993;5(1):34.
  8. Gabard DL, Martin ML. Physical Therapy Ethics. FA Davis, Philadelphia: 2003.
  9. Guide to Physical Therapist Practice 3.0. American Physical Therapy Association. http://www.apta.org.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EthicsPractice SupportProfessional Topics Tagged with:Association of Rheumatology Professionals (ARP)costsEthicspatient carePhysical Therapyrheumatology

Related Articles

    When to Refer Rheumatology Patients to Physical Therapy

    January 1, 2013

    Consider a physical therapist for your patients if they have difficulty adapting to a new disability, impaired range of motion or strength, a significant balance or gait disturbance, a history of falls, or mobility issues

    Occupational Therapy Can Benefit Rheumatology Patients

    November 2, 2014

    Patients often manage their condition better, perform daily activities with more ease with help from therapists

    The 2022 ARP President’s & Merit Awards

    November 6, 2022

    During ACR Convergence 2022 in early November, the ACR and the ARP honored a group of distinguished individuals who have made significant contributions to rheumatology research, education and patient care. This month, The Rheumatologist profiles the recipients of the ARP President’s and Merit Awards. ARP PRESIDENT’S AWARDS The ARP president can choose to honor ACR/ARP…

    Essential Collaboration: Rheumatologists & PTs Must Work Together

    July 14, 2017

    The importance of rheumatologists and physical therapists (PTs) working together for patients cannot be understated. Carol Oatis, PT, PhD, says, “Rheumatologists and PTs have very similar goals. … Collaboration is essential for optimal outcomes.”…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences