Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

FDA Approves Nintedanib for SSc-ILD, But Temper Your Expectations

Michael Putman, MD  |  Issue: December 2019  |  December 18, 2019

Side Effects

Most importantly, nintedanib is not a benign therapy. Treatment caused increased rates of diarrhea (75.7% vs. 31.6% placebo, number needed to harm [NNH] 2), vomiting (24.7% vs. 10.4% placebo, NNH 7) and weight loss (11.8% vs. 4.2% placebo, NNH 13). Many patients with systemic sclerosis can ill afford such side effects. In this trial, the rate of events that were “incapacitating or that caused an inability to work or to perform usual activities” was high (18.1% vs. 12.5% placebo, NNH 17.9). In the real world, with less intensive monitoring, it could be even worse.

Even accepting a low bar for a minimal clinically important difference, 13 patients would need to be treated with nintedanib for 1 to benefit.

Target Its Use

Selecting patients for therapy appropriately may mitigate these issues. The modified Rodnan skin score did not differ between groups, and nintedanib should not be offered as a treatment for skin disease. Limiting use to patients with diffuse systemic sclerosis or MMF intolerance may further focus treatment on the population most likely to benefit.

Conversely, nintedanib could be avoided in patients with low body mass index who can least afford weight loss. Such an approach would substantially reduce the eligible pool of patients and has not been studied. Physicians should be aware, though, that not all subgroups experienced a statistically significant or clinically meaningful benefit from therapy.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In summary, the benefit of nintedanib is modest at best. In subgroup analysis, patients receiving the standard of care or with limited systemic sclerosis did not significantly benefit. Quality of life did not improve, either with regard to FACIT-Dyspnea or HAQ-DI. The most likely outcome from therapy for the majority of patients will be adverse events. Strategies to mitigate these risks may help, but they remain untested.

Patients with systemic sclerosis ILD need new options, but rheumatologists should be cautious in offering them nintedanib. 


Michael Putman, MDMichael Putman, MD (@EBRheum), is a clinical instructor of medicine at Northwestern University and a member of the Fellows-in-Training Subcommittee. He is pursuing large vessel vasculitis research on a T32 training grant.

References

  1. Distler O, Highland KB, Gahlemann M, et al. Nintedanib for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 27;380(26):2518–2528.
  2. Phase III study showed nintedanib slows the loss of pulmonary function in people living with systemic sclerosis associated ILD (press release). Boehringer Ingelheim.
  3. Wells AU. Forced vital capacity as a primary end point in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment trials: Making a silk purse from a sow’s ear. Thorax. 2013 Apr;68(4):309–310.
  4. Kafaja S, Clements PJ, Wilhalme H, et al. Reliability and minimal clinically important differences of forced vital capacity. Results from the Scleroderma Lung Studies (SLS-I and SLS-II). Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Mar 1;197(5):644–652.

Note: This article is the opinion of the author and does not necessarily represent the views of the ACR or The Rheumatologist.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsDrug UpdatesSystemic Sclerosis Tagged with:interstitial lung disease (ILD)nintedanibSSc-ILDsystemic sclerosis (SSc)

Related Articles

    What Rheumatologists Need to Know about Diagnosing and Managing Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD)

    December 1, 2012

    Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), poly-/dermatomyositis (PM/DM), or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) appear to carry the greatest risk for developing connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD)
     

    Scleroderma & ILD: Practical Tips on the Diagnosis & Management of Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

    June 15, 2022

    No one-size-fits-all approach exists for the care and treatment of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and SSc with pulmonary involvement. Here, experts discuss some best clinical practices for these patients.

    Tocilizumab Effective for Early SSc-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

    September 22, 2021

    Treatment with tocilizimab preserved lung function in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) regardless of a patient’s level of lung involvement, according to a recent study.

    Lessons Learned from Two Scleroderma Lung Studies (Plus a Third That’s Recruiting Sites)

    August 16, 2019

    Historically, the early approach for treating interstitial lung disease (ILD) due to systemic sclerosis (SSc) involved immunosuppressant therapy, primarily with cytotoxic agents.1 Glucocorticoids in combination with another immunosuppressant agent, such as oral azathioprine or cyclophosphamide, were often used to treat patients with severe, progressive SSc-ILD.2 However, direct evidence to support this thera­peutic approach was lacking…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences