Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

FDA Warns ‘Don’t Use Tramadol in Children’ & More

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, BCGP  |  October 21, 2015

GENERIC_Drugs_500x270

FDA Warning: Don’t Use Tramadol in Children
Tramadol is not FDA approved for treating pain in patients age 17 years and younger.¹ The FDA is investigating the off-label use of tramadol in this patient population because of the rare and serious risks of slowed or difficulty breathing. Tramadol is hepatically converted to the active opioid, O-desmethyltramadol. Fast metabolizers convert the drug more rapidly and completely, leading to higher concentrations of the drug in the blood. This can lead to potentially fatal respiratory side effects.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Healthcare professionals need to be aware of these potentially serious outcomes of this agent in younger patients. Alternative analgesics should be sought.

Phase 2 Studies on ABT-494
The investigational, oral JAK-1 inhibitor, ABT-494, was shown to be effective for refractory moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in two Phase 2 studies.²

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In the BALANCE-1 study, patients with an inadequate response to at least one anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNF-alpha) agent received one of four ABT-494 doses for 12 weeks and were evaluated for an ACR20 response. ACR20 responses were achieved in 56% of patients who received 3 mg twice daily (P<0.05), 63% of those who received 6 mg twice daily (P<0.01), 73% of those who received 12 mg twice daily (P<0.001) and 71% of those who received 18 mg twice daily (P<0.001). Of placebo-treated patients, 35% achieved an ACR20 response. ACR50 and ACR70 responses were achieved in more active-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients.

In the BALANCE-2 study, patients with an inadequate response to methotrexate received one of four ABT-494 doses for 12 weeks and were evaluated for an ACR20 response. ACR20 responses were achieved in 65% of patients who received 3 mg twice daily, 73% of patients who received 6 mg twice daily (P<0.05), 82% of patients who received 12 mg twice daily (P<0.01), 77% of patients who received 18 mg twice daily (P<0.01) and 82% of patients who received 24 mg once daily (P<0.01). Of placebo-treated patients, 50% achieved an ACR20 response. Similar to BALANCE-1, ACR50 and ACR70 responses were achieved in more active-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients. In BALANCE-2, 30% of patients failed at least two anti-TNF-alpha agents. The most common side effect was headache.

ABT-494 is also in Phase 2 clinical trials for treating Crohn’s disease.

Michele B. Kaufman, PharmD, CGP, RPh, is a freelance medical writer based in New York City and a pharmacist at New York Presbyterian Lower Manhattan Hospital.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Drug Updates

Related Articles

    Safety, Tolerability & Pharmacodynamics of ABT-122 in Patients with RA

    December 5, 2017

    The introduction of biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has greatly expanded the treatment options for managing rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In many patients, biologic DMARDs improve clinical symptoms, improve function and slow disease progression. Biologic DMARDs are recommended as add-on treatment to conventional synthetic DMARDs, such as methotrexate (MTX) in patients who experienced an incomplete response…

    Upadacitinib Meets Study Endpoints to Treat RA

    July 5, 2017

    A recent clinical trial found that upadacitinib may effectively reduce disease activity at Week 12 for patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis…

    Rheumatology Drug Updates: Opana ER Painkiller Pulled from U.S. Market; Upadacitinib to Treat RA, and More

    August 13, 2017

    Opana ER Pulled from U.S. Market Last month, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked Endo Pharmaceuticals to remove oxymorphone hydrochloride extended release (Opana ER) from the U.S. market due to public health consequences related to abuse. The agency has concerns that the risks presented by the treatment do not outweigh its benefits.1 On…

    IV Tramadol Promising for Postoperative Pain; FDA Denies IV Meloxicam Approval

    July 2, 2018

    In its first phase 3 clinical trial, intravenous tramadol has met its primary endpoint for relieving postoperative pain…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences