Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

FDA Warns Makers of Superbug-Prone Scopes over Testing Violations

Reuters Staff  |  August 18, 2015

(Reuters)—Manufacturers of duodenoscopes linked to recent superbug outbreaks at U.S. hospitals skirted a host of testing, manufacturing and reporting requirements, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration said in warning letters to the companies released on Monday.

The letters, sent on Aug. 12, cite Olympus Corp Pentax Medical and Fujifilm Holdings Corp with multiple violations found during inspections of their U.S. and foreign facilities.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Violations range from not properly evaluating cleaning, sterilization and testing procedures to failure to report infections and other problems. Fujifilm and Pentax were also cited for violations in their marketing applications for the devices.

“The FDA takes these violations very seriously and will continue to monitor these firms to ensure they take appropriate corrective action,” the agency said in a statement. “However, currently available information indicates that the benefits of these devices continue to outweigh the risks in appropriately selected patients.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The FDA first warned of the potential for duodenoscopes to transmit antibiotic-resistant germs in 2009. Since then duodenoscopes have been implicated in superbug outbreaks at multiple U.S. hospitals, including one last year that may have exposed 179 patients at UCLA’s Ronald Reagan Medical Center.

The FDA conducted inspections at all three companies’ facilities earlier this year. In addition to testing and reporting violations the agency found that Pentax and Fujifilm had failed to apply for proper approval of one or more devices.

Fujifilm claimed that its ED-530XT device was very similar to the ED-450XT5, which had been cleared by the FDA. Device makers are not required to file for separate clearance of a device if changes made are minor. But they must explain, in a document kept on file should the FDA ever want to see it, why they did not file for clearance.

In the case of Fujifilm’s device, the FDA determined that there were significant differences between the ED-450XT5 and the ED-530XT and that a new 510(k) application was needed to demonstrate that the device was safe and effective and that it was substantially equivalent to a legally marketed device.

The FDA is also examining Pentax’s justifications for not filing for 510(k) clearance of its ED-3670TK scope and changes made to its ED-3490TK device.

Share: 

Filed under:Uncategorized Tagged with:duodenoscopesFDAInfectionsafety warning

Related Articles

    Medical Device Safety Concerns Rheumatologists

    December 12, 2011

    Are recent controversies over metal-on-metal hip replacements and an IOM report cause for worry?

    High-Risk Medical Devices Backed by Few Studies

    August 12, 2015

    (Reuters Health)—Many high-risk therapeutic devices get U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval with only one study proving their safety and efficacy before going to market. Studies of how the devices work once they are on the market are also few and far between, according to a new study that looked at all 28 high-risk…

    International Approvals for Guselkumab & Anakinra; Plus Adalimumab Biosimilar in Europe

    April 30, 2018

    In Japan the use of guselkumab to treat erythrodermic, plaque and pustular psoriasis is approved, and anakinra is now indicated for Still’s disease in the E.U…

    Many Medical Devices Hit the Market before Safety Studies Are Published

    June 5, 2016

    (Reuters Health)—Medical devices approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are often cleared before studies on their safety or effectiveness have been released to the public, a report suggests. Without published data, doctors and patients may not be able to make informed decisions about whether to use the products, the authors warn. ad…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences