Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Fellows’ Forum: 6 Tips to Improve Professional Feedback

Bharat Kumar, MD, MME, FACP, FAAAAI, RhMSUS  |  Issue: July 2017  |  July 13, 2017

In addition to softening the judgmental overtones often associated with feedback, the appraisal can be more nuanced and personalized. Of course, there will always be an element of subjective judgment, but acknowledging when that occurs can help divorce it from becoming a matter of opinion that a learner may not necessarily take seriously.

3. Feedback Has to Be Signposted

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Because feedback is so critical to medical education, you would be surprised how often you have received it and haven’t even realized it. Studies have shown that learners tend to underestimate the amount of feedback they receive, especially when it is not given in a timely manner.1,2 In order to get credit for giving and receiving feedback, educators really should declare that they are giving feedback. For example, with medical students, I often start with, “I’m going to provide some feedback here,” and end with, “What other feedback would you like?” It may come off as a little forward, but I don’t see much virtue in subtlety.

4. Feedback Must Be Valuable

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

When it comes to feedback, less can be more. A few impactful points are more useful than long discussions. Vague, if standard, compliments, such as, “You really did a good job,” should be avoided. After all, what does “a good job” mean, and why does it matter if a learner did a good job? The value of feedback is also dependent on the rapport between the learner and the teacher. If feedback is not geared toward and customized for the situation and the learner, then there really is no underlying communication of the message.

Feedback is a form of formative evaluation, a way of sculpting ourselves in small but meaningful ways so that we can get to our personal best.

5. Feedback Is a Two-Way Street

One of the ways to ensure authenticity is to level the playing field. A heavy-handed approach to giving feedback is unlikely to have an intended effect. Instead, honesty and frankness have to be emphasized, which necessarily means that we have to suspend the hierarchies that are endemic to medical education. This is obviously much easier said than done. I recommend that after each feedback session, the evaluator ask, “What questions do you have for me?” Or better yet, “What feedback can you provide for me?”

6. Feedback Requires Constant & Disciplined Practice

I’m not sure anyone can become perfect at giving or receiving feedback. I think the challenge of feedback is that it has to be intimately personalized. There’s no one-size-fits-all formula. It has to be individualized for each situation and person. Many learners are incredibly resistant to receiving feedback, which underscores the need to be consistent and fair in giving feedback. In fact, feedback on feedback needs to be periodically given, whether by learners or by colleagues.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Career DevelopmentProfessional Topics Tagged with:Career developmentEducationemployeeEvaluationfeedbackFellowsFellows ForumPractice ManagementProfessional TopicsrheumatologistrheumatologyTraining

Related Articles

    Teaching Junior Learners in Rheumatology

    July 13, 2022

    Teaching junior learners, such as medical students and residents, is increasingly important in rheumatology. Given the antici­pated shortage of rheumatologists, attracting more trainees to our field and enhancing knowledge of the rheumatic diseases among physicians in other fields are critical to meeting the needs of our patients.1,2 In addition, clinical reasoning is a vital skill…

    How to Provide Better Feedback to Fellows

    July 15, 2021

    Although providing feedback is often discussed as separate from teaching, it is the most important teaching we do as clinician-educators. Whether attending on the inpatient consult service or precepting in the clinic, providing direct feedback is the most effective way to help fellows advance their skills. Feedback, however, is only as good as the giver…

    How to Incorporate Learners in Your Clinic

    September 1, 2011

    Let your time with residents provide training opportunities, not undermine efficiency

    The Educator’s Toolbox: How Clinicians Can Master the Art of Teaching & Giving Effective Feedback

    January 6, 2020

    Insights into how to effectively teach & communicate feedback to students were offered in this Annual Meeting session…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences