Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Insurer Updates

Staff  |  Issue: October 2009  |  October 1, 2009

IFA Codes
Quest: 38318
LabCorp: 164947

WellPoint, BCBS Change Policy at ACR’s Request

After receiving a letter from the ACR, WellPoint agreed that it is no longer necessary to request a new authorization if moving a patient on etanercept to a different dosing schedule (e.g., from 50 mg to 25 mg twice weekly). In addition, WellPoint revised the Enbrel PAB form to remove the question regarding “systemic malignancy within the last five years.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Additionally, after receiving a letter from the ACR, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts has agreed to update its policy in the fall to cover anti-CCP testing for rheumatoid arthritis, stating, “anti-CCP testing is now considered medically necessary for the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.”

The ACR has long advocated for its members’ issues relating to health plan policy and has had many successes in this area. Through letters sent by CORC, positive changes have occurred.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Use Correct Lab Code to Get Correct ANA Test

Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) continues to be the gold standard to test for antinuclear antibodies (ANAs), and physicians can order these tests from commercial laboratories.

During the past decade, commercial clinical laboratories have adopted a wide variety of new tests, including solid-phase assays, for the detection of ANAs. Some commercial laboratories have adopted these new assays to replace traditional “gold standard” indirect immunofluorescence tests to screen for ANAs. The new solid-phase assays detect up to 13 specific autoantibodies, while indirect immunofluorescence using Hep-2 cell substrate detects more than 100 clinically relevant autoantibodies, which is why the task force is making its recommendation.

The potential problem with screening sera for ANAs using the limited number of autoantigens that are present in solid-phase assays was illuminated in a recent case record of the Massachusetts General Hospital (NEJM. 2009; 360:711-720), where the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus was significantly delayed because of a false-negative ANA test result that was determined using a non-indirect immunofluorescence method.

Over the past two years, the ACR ANA Taskforce—which was established as a result of the growing concerns ACR members had over this topic—has carefully reviewed the available literature concerning newer, solid-phase assays for the detection of ANAs. These solid-phase assays were developed to detect a limited number of specific autoantibodies in the serum of patients with autoimmune diseases. Although some of these tests have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in screening for ANAs, the taskforce did not find sufficient evidence to conclude that solid-phase screening assays are equivalent to indirect immunofluorescent assays for the detection of ANAs.

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:From the CollegePractice Support Tagged with:antinuclear antibodiesBillingHealth InsuranceRheumatoid arthritis

Related Articles

    Laboratory Testing for Diagnosis, Management of Patients with Rheumatic Disease

    December 1, 2014

    A review of data on antinuclear antibodies and tests for rheumatoid arthritis

    Know Your Labs

    February 1, 2009

    A review of state-of-the-art testing for SLE and connective tissue disease.

    New Study Reveals Limitations in ANA Test Kits for Lupus

    September 20, 2018

    The variability in serological testing for antinuclear antibodies (ANA) is under investigation after unexpected findings were reported from clinical trials of new agents to treat systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). In “Assay Variation in the Detection of Antinuclear Antibodies in the Sera of Patients with Established SLE,” David S. Pisetsky, MD, PhD, and his colleagues demonstrate…

    Study Finds ANA-Negative Classification Errors Among Newly Diagnosed Lupus Patients

    October 18, 2019

    How laboratories define a serological hallmark of systemic lupus erythematous and which assays they use to detect it could contribute to misclassification of patients identified as anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) negative, according to researchers. Most people who have lupus test positive for ANAs as part of an immunology screening for autoimmune disorders. The presence of ANAs…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences