The Rheumatologist
COVID-19 News
  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed
  • Home
  • Conditions
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • SLE (Lupus)
    • Crystal Arthritis
      • Gout Resource Center
    • Spondyloarthritis
    • Osteoarthritis
    • Soft Tissue Pain
    • Scleroderma
    • Vasculitis
    • Systemic Inflammatory Syndromes
    • Guidelines
  • Resource Centers
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis Resource Center
    • Gout Resource Center
    • Psoriatic Arthritis Resource Center
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
  • Drug Updates
    • Biologics & Biosimilars
    • DMARDs & Immunosuppressives
    • Topical Drugs
    • Analgesics
    • Safety
    • Pharma Co. News
  • Professional Topics
    • Ethics
    • Legal
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Career Development
      • Certification
      • Education & Training
    • Awards
    • Profiles
    • President’s Perspective
    • Rheuminations
    • Interprofessional Perspective
  • Practice Management
    • Billing/Coding
    • Quality Assurance/Improvement
    • Workforce
    • Facility
    • Patient Perspective
    • Electronic Health Records
    • Apps
    • Information Technology
    • From the College
    • Multimedia
      • Audio
      • Video
  • Resources
    • Issue Archives
    • ACR Convergence
      • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Resource Center
      • Rheumatoid Arthritis Resource Center
      • Gout Resource Center
      • Abstracts
      • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence Home
    • American College of Rheumatology
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Research Reviews
    • ACR Journals
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
    • Rheumatology Image Library
    • Treatment Guidelines
    • Rheumatology Research Foundation
    • Events
  • About Us
    • Mission/Vision
    • Meet the Authors
    • Meet the Editors
    • Contribute to The Rheumatologist
    • Subscription
    • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Search
You are here: Home / Articles / Is It Time to Reevaluate Your Physician Compensation Model?

Is It Time to Reevaluate Your Physician Compensation Model?

December 1, 2013 • By Steven M. Harris, Esq.

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version / Save PDF

A significant advantage to this methodology is that it offers security. It also enables rheumatologists to increase their income through performance. On the down side, this methodology may cause minimum work standards to become de facto norms. This methodology also places a large component of income at risk, depends on subjective measurements in apportioning that at-risk portion, and can be complex to design and administer.

You Might Also Like
  • A Guide to Understanding Physician Compensation Models
  • Glaxo’s Move on Physician Compensation Could Signal Shift in Pharmaceutical Promotions
  • New Physician Payment Reforms Highlight Need for Quality Coding, Accurate Documentation
Explore This Issue
December 2013
Also By This Author
  • How to Bring the Physician-Patient Relationship to a Peaceful End

Pure Productivity

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

A pure productivity compensation methodology is sometimes referred to as “eat what you kill.” Under this methodology, a rheumatologist is paid a certain percentage of what he or she brings into the practice. The remaining collections are typically paid to the practice in order to cover overhead expenses, such as leases, malpractice insurance, support personnel, equipment, and supplies.

The obvious advantage of this model is that it encourages extra professional effort and seems “just” in a capitalistic economic system. The disadvantages are that it feeds intragroup competition, requires substantial accounting management to assign overhead burden fairly, encourages overutilization, and can even discourage “corporate citizenship,” such as practice governance and management, teaching, and other activities not connected with patient visits.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Productivity Plus Capitation Mix

Capitation rewards certain physician behavior, such as appropriate utilization, and encourages physicians to have an interest in appropriate and efficient provision of care. The productivity-plus-capitation-mix methodology recognizes the different revenue streams coming into a practice, rewards physician activity appropriately per stream, and encourages efficiency as physicians move into pure capitation. It is, however, complicated to administer, and the two-tiered practice style it encourages can create a dichotomy within the practice, with differential treatment levels based on patients’ payment streams.

In today’s competitive environment, any effective compensation formula should also address the following five qualities:

ad goes here:advert-3
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  • First, it should be economically fair.
  • Second, it should be comprehensible, especially to the rheumatologists being compensated.
  • Third, it should not be excessively difficult for management to monitor and administer, and it should be flexible enough to allow for possible future modification.
  • Fourth, it should be consistent with the philosophy and mission statement of the practice.
  • And finally, it should stimulate rheumatologists to be effective, with definable financial rewards for behavior and activity the practice needs and wishes to encourage, including encouraging and incentivizing rheumatologists to be more accountable for:
  • Patient outcomes, including quality of care;
  • Overall patient satisfaction;
  • Administrative responsibilities, including electronic medical record implementation and other practice compliance policies;
  • Physician recruiting, including speaking at conferences;
  • Serving on committees, both internal (for larger practices) as well as for outside organizations;
  • Practice marketing efforts, including developing new physician referral sources; and
  • Mentoring young physicians who are new to the practice.

Overall compensation models should incorporate strategies designed to meet the new patient care accountability standards, retain existing rheumatologists, and stay competitive in the practice’s physician recruiting efforts.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Legal, Practice Management Tagged With: physician, Practice Management, rheumatology, SalaryIssue: December 2013

You Might Also Like:
  • A Guide to Understanding Physician Compensation Models
  • Glaxo’s Move on Physician Compensation Could Signal Shift in Pharmaceutical Promotions
  • New Physician Payment Reforms Highlight Need for Quality Coding, Accurate Documentation
  • Employment Agreement Considerations for a New Practitioner

Simple Tasks

Learn more about the ACR’s public awareness campaign and how you can get involved. Help increase visibility of rheumatic diseases and decrease the number of people left untreated.

Visit the Simple Tasks site »

ACR Convergence

Don’t miss rheumatology’s premier scientific meeting for anyone involved in research or the delivery of rheumatologic care or services.

Visit the ACR Convergence site »

American College of Rheumatology

Visit the official website for the American College of Rheumatology.

Visit the ACR »

The Rheumatologist newsmagazine reports on issues and trends in the management and treatment of rheumatic diseases. The Rheumatologist reaches 11,500 rheumatologists, internists, orthopedic surgeons, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, nurses, and other healthcare professionals who practice, research, or teach in the field of rheumatology.

About Us / Contact Us / Advertise / Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

  • Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • Feed

Copyright © 2006–2022 American College of Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

ISSN 1931-3268 (print)
ISSN 1931-3209 (online)