Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Make Me A Match

Jill Landis, MD  |  Issue: November 2006  |  November 1, 2006

Individual applications were completed 18 months to two years in advance of the start date. Each program had its own requirements and deadline. Program directors then sorted the applications and selected applicants for interview. Applicants went on interviews, often interviewing with one program months before another. Program directors then began making offers to selected candidates. Frequently, an applicant was asked to make a decision about an offer before knowing if he or she would receive other offers.

According to Dennis W. Boulware, MD, senior associate dean for academic affairs at the University of Alabama Health System and past president of the Association of Subspecialty Professors, “It was not uncommon to be given an offer and have to make a decision within a day—or even an hour.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Match Facts and Numbers

  • Number of programs that participated in the 2006 match: 94
  • Number of training positions available in the 2006 match: 162
  • Percentage of training positions filled in the 2006 match: 96%
  • Number of applicants who participated in the 2006 match: 378
  • Percent increase from the number of applicants in 2005: 18%

Program directors found it disadvantageous to allow an applicant significant time to think over an offer. If the applicant rejected it, their next choice for the position may have already accepted an offer elsewhere. As a result, some program directors began to offer training positions to applicants earlier and earlier in the process.

In reviewing these scenarios, the Committee on Training and Workforce Issues, whose responsibilities include overseeing the application and acceptance of fellows into rheumatology training programs, identified many areas of concern in the pre-match system:

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
  1. Each program had its own paper application.
  2. Each program had its own timetable for receiving applications and conducting interviews.
  3. The application process started early in the second year of medical residency. This factor may have limited the number of internal medicine residents who would apply for rheumatology fellowships because of lack of contact or experience with this subspecialty.
  4. Applicants felt pressured to accept positions before receiving all potential offers, causing anxiety and limiting their ability to obtain their first choice.
  5. Program directors felt pressured to offer positions to multiple applicants simultaneously, as it was unclear who had already accepted a training spot. Occasionally, this led to the worst-case scenario of having to rescind an offer if too many applicants accepted.
  6. The variable timetable of this process made it difficult for applicants to examine different regions of the county for their subspecialty training. Residents tended to stay “close to home,” and were less likely to seek out a more varied experience at a distant hospital.

Universal Electronic Application

In recognition of these problems, the ACR adopted the match, and also the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) universal application. Since the commencement of these programs, potential rheumatology fellows begin the application process by utilizing ERAS. This service supplies a universal online application and allows applicants to virtually attach transcripts, letters of recommendation, tests scores, and other credentials.

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Career DevelopmentEducation & TrainingProfessional TopicsTechnology Tagged with:FellowsMatchProfessionalismTraining

Related Articles

    Trainee Perspectives on Virtual Applicant Interviews

    July 14, 2022

    Since the beginning of the pandemic, the ACR’s Committee on Training and Workforce (COTW) has been interested in better understanding how fellowship recruitment is affected by virtual recruitment from the perspectives of both program directors and trainees. This past year, the COTW conducted a survey study to gain the perspective of program directors.1 The Rheumatology…

    Virtual Recruitment in 2020 and Beyond: Rheumatology Fellowship Program Directors Survey Results

    July 15, 2021

    In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, all rheumatology fellowship interviews conducted in the 2020 fellowship recruitment season were conducted in a virtual, video-based format to reduce the risks associated with travel and face-to-face meetings. In June 2020, the Coalition for Physician Accountability released guidance suggesting all programs commit to online-only interviews and recruitment events, even…

    5 Takeaways from the 2018 Rheumatology Fellowship Match Data

    July 15, 2020

    If you’re a rheumatologist, you likely remember the moment of truth on your match day—the day of revelation, when the complex computer algorithm set up by the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) accommodates the wishes of programs and applicants and then discloses into which program an applicant has been placed. Although it has always been…

    New Match Schedule Could Open Opportunities

    June 13, 2011

    Program directors hope change in subspecialty match dates will attract more fellows to rheumatology

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences