SAN DIEGO—What does cannabis offer to the treatment and management of rheumatology patients and the range of pain states they experience? What do we really know about its long-term effects? These are hard questions to answer with currently available data and a reality nuanced by complications cannabis advocates don’t always recognize, according to two experts presenting at the ACR/ARHP 2017 Annual Meeting Nov. 3–8.
Explore this issueFebruary 2018
Also by this Author
Cannabis refers to all the various products and chemicals, including marijuana, derived from the cannabis plant. “We’ve had debates about cannabis, pro and con,” said Rosalie Pacula, PhD, of the Rand Drug Policy Research Center in Santa Monica, Calif. Debating the pros and cons of whether cannabis could be used therapeutically is no longer as relevant, she said, because marijuana has been legalized in states representing 20% of the U.S. population and is allowed for medical use in many others. The picture at the state level is further complicated by the fact that marijuana remains illegal under federal law. “We should now talk instead about what cannabis does and how it affects society,” she said.
States have been experimenting with cannabis policy since the 1970s, starting with decriminalization policies and then medical marijuana.1 But state policies on marijuana remain a hodge-podge that continues to evolve. Researchers must understand the impact of state policies on use. Too often, research findings neglect the heterogeneity of state policies, policy evolution and the timing of changes, Dr. Pacula said. Academic researchers have only just begun to see the implications of these nuances.| | | Next → | Single Page