Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Most Rheumatologists Want FDA to Better Regulate Biosimilars

Richard Quinn  |  July 24, 2015

GENERIC_Drugs_500x270A new survey from the Coalition of State Rheumatology Organizations (CSRO) has found a majority of rheumatologists are concerned about the safety of biosimilars. The findings add another critical voice to the efforts to ensure that novel treatments are used effectively in the future, according to an ACR committee member.

More than 82% of rheumatologists surveyed believe the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must set rigorous standards for switching between biosimilar drugs. More than 75% of rheumatologists believe the FDA should make sure biosimilars have a different non-proprietary name than the innovator biologic medicine. And nearly 96% of respondents said the FDA should require labeling to identify a medication as a biosimilar.1

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

“Most of the rheumatologists that I know are cautiously optimistic about biosimilars, but really concerned about the safety and efficacy piece,” says Kwas Huston, MD, a member of the ACR’s  Committee on Rheumatologic Care. “The survey demonstrates that there is an overwhelming consensus that we must be vigilant and make sure these drugs are safe.”

In addition to the survey results, CSRO announced policy recommendations on the naming of biosimilars to ensure there’s no confusion with the innovator product and the prominent display on labels of any safety difference between the biologic and its biosimilar. These recommendations closely mirror suggestions the ACR has pushed for regarding safety.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

In March, the FDA announced it had approved the first biosimilar drug: the cancer treatment Zarxio. The potential for biosimilars in treating rheumatic diseases is something the ACR supports, but “decisions regarding approval of biosimilars must be driven by sound science,” the ACR’s position paper reads.2

“We require the FDA to provide diligent guidance on how these drugs will be evaluated and approved,” Dr. Huston adds. “I hope the FDA takes that to heart. The only way for biosimilars to enter the market and bring down overall costs [of treatment] is to ensure confidence in the safety and efficacy of these medications.”

Richard Quinn is a freelance writer in New Jersey.

References

  1. Coalition of State Rheumatology Organizations. News release: CSRO releases physician biosimilars survey results. 2015 July 1.
  2. ACR Committee on Rheumatologic Care. American College of Rheumatology position statement: Biosimilars. February 2015.

Share: 

Filed under:Biologics/DMARDsDrug Updates Tagged with:Biologics & BiosimilarsCoalition of State Rheumatology Organizations (CSRO)Drug SafetyDrugsFDA

Related Articles

    Marching to the Biosimilar Beat: Questions on Rollout Remain

    September 7, 2023

    The availability of biosimilars for the treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases exploded in 2023. Here’s where we stand and what to expect going forward.

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    The Biosimilars Debate Heats Up: Potential cost savings weighed against patient health & safety

    March 1, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    Possible Impact of Biosimilar Infliximab on U.S. Market in Prescriptions, Pricing

    September 8, 2016

    The use of biosimilars for rheuma­tology in the U.S. became a reality when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Inflectra (infliximab-dyyb), a biosimilar to Remicade (infliximab), in April. What this may mean is increased competition among drug companies with regard to pricing and, therefore, potentially lower costs for U.S. patients, according to Seoyoung…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences