Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Neti Pots, Nurse Ambassadors & American Healthcare

Philip Seo, MD, MHS  |  Issue: March 2021  |  March 15, 2021

Choiceless Choices

The bulk of the complaint, however, makes me wonder whether California’s attorney general (AG) has any idea what it is like to be a practicing rheumatologist. The AG seems to be laboring under the misunderstanding that, when a patient needs a TNF inhibitor, I am free to choose whichever drug I want. As you know, that is far from the case.

‘A nurse ambassador, who could potentially take many patient problems off my plate, might buy at least as much goodwill as a burger and fries.’

‘A nurse ambassador, who could potentially take many patient problems off my plate, might buy at least as much goodwill as a burger and fries.’

When I am planning to prescribe a TNF inhibitor, I make certain my note documents the treatment history, so it is clear to the insurer the patient has had an adequate trial of cheaper medications. Some of my colleagues go as far as to treat an especially active rheumatoid arthritis patient with both methotrexate and hydroxychloroquine, so the patient can simultaneously fail two medications, which is required by some insurers to green-light a biologic. My note will also document the patient meets the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis, even though ACR criteria were never intended to be used to determine which patients were worthy of treatment with a biologic.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

That’s just the beginning. Whenever I write a prescription for a biologic, I warn the patient that it may be months before they receive the drug. Sometimes, the insurer wants more documentation that I know what I’m doing. Sometimes, the insurer wants me to first try another biologic, or another brand. Those decisions are largely made by the pharmacy benefit managers, which steer me to the drug that allows them to generate the greatest profit.

In theory, programs like nurse ambassadors may discourage clinicians from prescribing biosimilars. As a clinician, I know the decision to prescribe biosimilars has been taken out of my hands. Biosimilars were supposed to lead to $54 billion in cost savings in the U.S. In practice, widespread biosimilar use has been hindered by litigation that blocks their sale and by the pharmacy benefit managers who use the threat of biosimilars to drive down the price they pay for brand name drugs.9

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Rituximab is a good example of this. Many of my patients now receive treatment with biosimilar rituximab, rather than the brand name agent. I just can’t predict which agent any given patient may receive. Counterintuitively, I find the pharmacy benefit managers will often insist I prescribe the brand name originator biologic, which is just further proof of how arbitrary drug prices really are.

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:OpinionProfessional TopicsRheuminationsSpeak Out Rheum Tagged with:medication compliancenurse ambassadors

Related Articles

    Marching to the Biosimilar Beat: Questions on Rollout Remain

    September 7, 2023

    The availability of biosimilars for the treatment of patients with rheumatic diseases exploded in 2023. Here’s where we stand and what to expect going forward.

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    Biosimilars Debate Heats up over Cost Savings, Safety Concerns

    April 15, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

    Report on EU’s Experience with Biosimilar Drugs Released: Will U.S. Experience Be Similar?

    October 17, 2017

    As questions about biosimilar medications swirl among U.S. rheumatologists, a recently released report sheds some light on the European experience with biosimilars—and may offer some important insights for the U.S. market. The report, Biosimilars in the EU: Information Guide for Healthcare Professionals, was released in late April by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the…

    The Biosimilars Debate Heats Up: Potential cost savings weighed against patient health & safety

    March 1, 2016

    After years of speculation about potential cost savings and debates on safety, biosimilars are about to step onto the stage of rheumatic disease treatment. On Feb. 9, the Arthritis Advisory Committee of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) met in Washington, D.C., and recommended the approval of CT-P13, a proposed biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade),…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences