Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Osteoporosis Screening Is Underutilized Despite Recommendations

Mary Beth Nierengarten  |  Issue: August 2017  |  August 15, 2017

Notable in the study, however, is the low rates of screening for women aged 65 and older. The study found that fewer than one in four women in this age group underwent screening for primary prevention during a two-year period, says Dr. Gillespie.

When looking at screening rates by race, the study found disparities: Non-Hispanic black women were the least likely to be screened, and Hispanic women and Asian women the most likely to undergo screening. Dr. Gillespie emphasizes, however, that over time, these disparities narrowed substantially. “For example, the disparity in adjusted screened probabilities comparing white and black women was reduced by 66% among women aged 50–64 and was virtually eliminated among women age 65+,” she says.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Underutilization of Services Following Hip Fracture

In the study looking at screening rates between 2008 and 2014 in women following a first hip fracture, Dr. Gillespie and Ms. Morin also found low utilization rates, with only 9.9% of women receiving bone mass measurement within six months of fracture and 12.7% within 12 months of fracture.3

When looking at specific age groups, women 80 years and older were significantly less likely to utilize recommended osteo­porosis screening and treatment services within six months of their fracture compared with women aged 50–79 years old (13.8% vs. 20.8%, P<0.001). Overall, the study found that the use of pharmacotherapy in this age group declined over the study period.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

For women aged 65 and older, the study found a significant increase in osteoporosis screening over the study period, but a decline in use of pharmacotherapy to treat osteoporosis.

For women aged 50–64 years, osteo­porosis screening declined over the study period, but the use of pharmacotherapy remained steady.

Overall, Dr. Gillespie and Ms. Morin emphasize that the study highlights that only one in five women receives the recommended osteoporosis care in a timely manner and find this “alarming.”

Why the Persistently Low Rates?

Karen Hansen, MD, MS, associate professor, Division of Rheumatology and Endocrinology, University of Wisconsin Health, Madison, Wis., offered a number of potential explanations for the low utilization of osteoporosis screening. Among these, she says, is the misperception of the lack of safety of the drugs used to treat osteoporosis. Another is the continual gradual reduction in Medicare reimbursement for bone density tests that has resulted in fewer clinics offering them. For older patients, she highlights the thinking by many patients that fractures are simply a part of the aging process and are to be expected. In addition, when compared with the other multiple health problems many older patients face, such as heart and lung disease, bone health doesn’t rank as a priority in many of these patients.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsOsteoarthritis and Bone DisordersResearch Rheum Tagged with:bone density testbone diseasebone massbone mineral density (BMD)Fractureship fractureOsteoporosispreventionResearchrheumatologistscreeningWomen

Related Articles

    Unexpected Benefits of Bisphosphonates after Hip Fracture

    February 3, 2012

    Recent trials show this bisphosphonates can reduce subsequent hip fractures and mortality, while remaining cost effective.

    Build Up Bone

    June 1, 2007

    Current management of osteoporosis

    Osteoporosis Experts Discuss Bisphosphonate Holidays

    November 24, 2020

    ACR CONVERGENCE 2020—Bisphosphonates are an important treatment for millions of older Americans with osteoporosis because the drugs inhibit osteoclastic bone resorption to reduce the risk of painful, debilitating fractures.1 More than 20 years ago, data emerged that bisphosphonates have a long terminal half-life.2 So after years of therapy, could some patients take a drug holiday?…

    Prevent Osteoporotic Fractures with a Fracture Liaison Service

    May 18, 2019

    Imagine leaving the hospital after suffering a heart attack without being treated for hypertension or being started on a beta blocker. What would we think of the hospital where patients are never educated about the relationship between treating hypertension and reducing myocardial infarction and stroke risk? Unfortunately, this happens every day with osteoporosis and fractures…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences