Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Payments Cut to the Bone

Norra MacReady  |  Issue: February 2007  |  February 1, 2007

The current reimbursement schedule for DXA and VFA could have a profound impact on doctors’ ability to offer these screening tests to every appropriate candidate, some experts believe.

Rheumatologists and many other physicians are deeply concerned about the decrease in Medicare reimbursement for dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) that took effect on January 1. The current reimbursement schedule will reduce practice expense reimbursement from the 2006 levels of approximately $140 for DXA and $40 for VFA to $40 and $25, respectively, by 2010—less than it costs to actually perform and interpret the tests.

“The proposed rates of reimbursement simply will not make up the expense of doing it in the physician’s office,” says Steven Petak, MD, president of the American Academy of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE), and immediate past president of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD). “If this goes into effect, my practice may have to stop seeing new Medicare patients. It’s a heartbreaking decision, but otherwise we’d go bankrupt.”

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The cuts are due in part to a program of general governmental belt tightening mandated by bill S.1932, better known as the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA). The DRA resulted from a congressional budget resolution to reduce spending by about $35 billion from 2006 to 2010. According to Congressional Budget Office estimates, enacting the DRA as written would reduce direct congressional spending by a total of $99 billion from 2006 through 2015. The net savings on Medicare and Medicaid combined over that time period would be $11.2 billion.

The bill requires reimbursement for imaging services to be cut by a total of $2.8 billion from 2007 to 2010, and by $8.1 billion through 2015. This would be accomplished, in part, by capping payment for the technical component of the exam—that is, the actual performance of the examination, rather than the interpretative aspect—at the rates paid for an exam performed in a hospital, even if it is actually performed in a physician’s office. Congress lumped DXA and VFA in with other imaging studies like PET and CT, even though the bone-density exams are simpler and less expensive to perform.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Additional reimbursement cuts to DXA happened through the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid’s (CMS’) five-year review process and when CMS changed the way it calculates practice expense.

Why a Reduction?

Every five years, the CMS must review the rates at which Medicare reimburses doctors for various treatments and procedures and, when necessary, adjusts them to reflect changes in technology, utilization, and other factors. The Medicare Physician Fee Schedule has three components: work, consisting of the actual physician work of performing a given treatment or test; practice, such as non-physician work time, equipment and supplies; and professional liability. In 2006, CMS also had to take into account the provisions of the DRA as it determined what changes, if any, to make in the work and practice portion of the fee schedule. To help guide their decisions, CMS officials rely on advice from the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) convened by the AMA. The RUC, in turn, makes recommendations based on its examination of any new data and the opinions of expert consultants.

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Practice Support Tagged with:Billingdual-energy x-ray absorptiometryDXAMedicarepatient carePractice ManagementReimbursement

Related Articles

    How Rheumatologists Are Paid: Luke Barré, MD, Joins AMA Committee That Helps Shape Physician Fee Schedule

    October 7, 2022

    The American Medical Association’s Relative Value Update Committee advises the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services on appropriate reimbursement rates for specialty services. Luke Barré, MD, MPH, RhMSUS, is learning the ropes as the ACR’s newest representative.

    The Relative Value Update Process: Your Input Makes a Difference

    November 5, 2021

    Selected ACR members will be invited to participate in a survey from the AMA Relative Value Update Committee. If you do, respond by the listed date. Data from these surveys helps set Medicare and other payer reimbursement rates.

    How to Decipher the American Medical Association’s Billing, Coding Processes

    April 15, 2016

    The American Medical Association consists of two key groups: 1) the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC), which oversees the annual updates to the physician work relative values, and 2) the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Editorial Panel, which assigns new or revised codes in the CPT book. The CPT Process Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) was…

    Rheumatology Coding Corner Question: Coding & Billing Basics

    April 15, 2016

    When reporting E/M service levels, if time spent counseling and/or coordinating care dominates the session, which of the following is true? Total time must be documented Greater than 50% of the time must be for face-to-face counseling and/or coordinating care The extent of the counseling and/or coordinating care must be documented All of the above…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences