Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Permanent Vision Loss in Late Giant Cell Arteritis

Kimberly Retzlaff  |  Issue: October 2018  |  October 18, 2018

Patients with late GCA represented 7.4% of all GCA patients in the hospital-based inception cohort. GCA was diagnosed an average of 27 months after PMR or peripheral arthritis. Permanent visual loss developed in 10 patients, including eight of 48 (17%) who developed cranial arteritis. Patients with either form of GCA—usual or late—experienced similar outcomes.

At disease onset, patients with late GCA and controls were indistinguishable, except for a higher proportion of women in the late GCA group. The groups were similar in terms of baseline erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, as well as proportions of patients experiencing long-lasting remission, relapses and resistant PMR or peripheral arthritis.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Cranial arteritis was the sole or prom­inent clinical feature in 48 patients (72%) and was typical (presenting with three or more of the following features: new-onset headache of moderate to severe intensity, jaw claudication or trismus, other jaw/mouth/throat problems, scalp tenderness, and an abnormal temporal artery on physical examination) in 33. Of these 48 patients, eight (17%) developed permanent visual loss (bilateral in three). Twelve patients exhibited transient, visual ischemic symptoms, and four of these developed permanent vision defects. In total, 18 patients (27%) developed visual ischemic symptoms, and all but one exhibited other features of cranial arteritis. Four other patients had extraocular permanent ischemic manifestations. Additionally, subclinical aortitis, headache, and fever were less often associated with late GCA than with the more usual form of GCA.

“Our study demonstrated that late GCA involves a visual ischemic risk that is similar to that of more usual forms of GCA and, therefore, not absorbed by a previous (or current) glucocorticoid treatment for a PMR,” says Dr. Liozon. “As in usual GCA, the risk of permanent visual loss in late GCA is increased in the presence of cranial signs and symptoms, albeit not always prominently, but is much lower in patients featuring systemic symptoms alone or associated with active PMR without cranial features. the implication of this is that any PMR patient (treated or recovered) who recalls persistent cranial symptoms should urgently be explored for a possible late GCA.”

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Additional findings showed that of the 20 patients with negative temporal artery biopsy (TAB) (18) or no TAB (2), 12 had large vessel vasculitis evident in positron emission tomography (PET) or computed tomography (CT) scans. Of the 10 patients with previously negative TAB, eight had positive contralateral TAB data at the time of GCA diagnosis. Sixteen patients (24%) had prominent systemic disease mainly diagnosed by fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET; of these 16, only one (6%) experienced visual damage.

Implications

“Based on [these] results, patients with iso­lated PMR do not require more intensive medical care, as long as they do not develop atypical symptoms or signs,” Dr. Liozon says. “rather, our message to rheumatologists is to suggest that they keep in mind that every case of PMR [carries] a risk of developing GCA, notably (but not solely) during the first two years following diagnosis.”

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsVasculitis Tagged with:peripheral arthritisPolymyalgia Rheumaticavision lossvisual loss

Related Articles

    Two Inflammatory Conditions—Polymyalgia Rheumatica and Giant Cell Arteritis—Share Clinical Connection

    March 1, 2013

    Polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and giant cell arteritis (GCA) have common clinical and epidemiologic links, but they need not occur synchronously

    Case Report: Giant Cell Arteritis-Related Stroke

    September 10, 2023

    Thromboembolic events are major contributors to the morbidity and mortality of patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), but little is known about how GCA may increase the risk of ischemic strokes. GCA-related stroke is described as an ischemic cerebral infarct occurring within three to four weeks of GCA diagnosis and treatment. It occurs in 3–7%…

    Updates on Giant Cell Arteritis

    March 19, 2018

    SAN DIEGO—Recent research tells us more about giant cell arteritis (GCA) to help rheumatologists more accurately diagnose and effectively treat patients with this type of vasculitis. On Nov. 6 at the ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting, three experts explored the latest findings on GCA pathogenesis, diagnostic approaches, imaging modalities and growing treatment options. GCA: What’s Really Happening?…

    Experts Discuss Proposed Giant Cell Arteritis Risk Tool

    April 26, 2018

    A proposed model to predict the risk of giant cell arteritis (GCA) prior to a temporal artery biopsy could help triage patients and guide decision making about the need for biopsy or monitoring (see Figure 1). There’s no specific biomarker for GCA, and GCA can be a “diagnostic conundrum, especially when it presents in an…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences