Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Ethics Forum: Physicians Face Ethical Quandary Discussing Poor Prognosis with Patients

Rashmi Shah, MD, Jennifer Barton, MD, & Robert H. Shmerling, MD  |  Issue: January 2016  |  January 19, 2016

For Patient 1, beneficence could translate into allowing the patient to hold onto his optimism and the activities he values highly. He is upbeat, and despite the recommendation to avoid cold exposure, he seems uninterested in altering his lifestyle in the face of this potentially progressive illness. To step to the side would be the path of least resistance and may be a reasonable approach during your initial visit as you establish the patient’s trust; after all, too much information on the first visit could overwhelm him.

However, in the interest of patient autonomy, he should be fully informed about his condition so he can make his own decisions about changes in lifestyle and treatments.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Thus, it would be important to ensure this patient has a reasonable understanding of expected complications and knows he should be vigilant about reporting them. For example, he needs to know about the importance of having regular blood pressure monitoring and reporting consistently high readings given his risk factors for renal crisis. The other concern is that the patient should understand the risks of cold exposure during ski trips, the risks of triggering ischemic injury and preventive measures he can take.

Patient 2 seems devastated by her diagnosis and has imagined a worst-case scenario for herself. Beneficence could translate into trying to maintain hope by trying to convince her that things are not so dire and that she should consider the possibility of a best-case scenario (or at least something better than she’s envisioned). Although this may help calm her in the short term, it may risk instilling a false sense of hope; it would be easy to paint a rosier picture than the reality warrants.

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Out of respect for patient autonomy, you may offer emotional support, fully discuss the clinical picture and emphasize the poor predictability of prognosis and significant variation from individual to individual. As with the first patient, it may take time to establish trust and to understand what support the patient has and how she prefers to receive information. With an appropriate social and emotional support system in place, this high-functioning, intelligent woman may be able to process all of the information and make a well-informed decision about the subsequent steps in her care despite her initial reaction.

Learn from Colleagues in Palliative Care

Rheumatologists can take a page from the palliative care literature on how to deliver bad news and incorporate the basic principles for the initial breaking of bad news. These include advanced preparation, allowing emotional ventilation, achieving a common perception of the problem, addressing information needs, responding to immediate medical risks and ensuring a basic plan for follow-up.4,5

Page: 1 2 3 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:EthicsPractice SupportProfessional Topics Tagged with:Ethicspatient communicationphysicianprognosis

Related Articles

    Updated ACP Ethics Manual Provides 6-Step Approach to Dilemmas

    January 15, 2019

    NEW YORK (Reuters Health)—The 2019 edition of the American College of Physicians (ACP) ethics manual provides a six-step approach to resolving ethical dilemmas and adds or expands sections that address emerging issues in 21st century medicine.1 “The Manual provides succinct guidance on issues that affect the patient-physician relationship, and also issues that have to do…

    AMA Updates Code of Medical Ethics

    January 17, 2017

    Eight years ago, the American Medical Association’s (AMA) Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs embarked on a comprehensive review of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics. What emerged after years of hard effort, intensive feedback and thoughtful revisions was a modernized version of the guide, which the AMA House of Delegates voted to adopt in…

    Ethics Forum: Unexpected Ethical Issues in Private Practice, Clinical Research

    July 14, 2016

    Ethical issues that arise in the average rheumatology practice and in clinical research are often straightforward. The AMA Code of Medical Ethics and the Office Practice and Procedures Manual offer useful information.1 In research, the Protocol and Investigators Agreement spells out who you can enroll and how the trial must be conducted. But still—even when…

    Ethics Forum: The Challenge of Multidisciplinary Care in Rheumatology

    May 1, 2014

    A patient with autoimmune ocular disease raises concerns about the moral, professional obligations of rheumatologists to help patients whose condition is not clearly within the scope of rheumatology

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences