Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

Pros, Cons of Provider-Based Conversions

Steven M. Harris, Esq.  |  Issue: September 2015  |  September 15, 2015

Impact on the hospital. Although conversions can be extremely costly and time consuming, doing so expands the services provided by the hospital, allowing it to serve a greater percentage of the population. In addition, the higher reimbursement paid to the hospital for billing the technical component of the services provided at the converted facilities increases hospital revenue. The extra money can be used to improve or create new hospital service lines or enhance the hospital’s ability to care for indigent patients. Also, so long as the hospital is properly enrolled, it can purchase pharmaceuticals at a significantly reduced cost for administration in the provider-based facility.

Integrated healthcare can lead to better patient outcomes, which improve patient satisfaction.

Regulatory Considerations

Tremendous effort goes into converting an independent physician practice to a provider-based department of the hospital. The good news for physicians is that most of the work is performed by the hospital. The bad news is that the process can take months to complete. Physicians often find it frustrating to work with the various hospital departments to get the practice up and running in compliance with the provider-based regulations. The more a physician understands the provider-based criteria, the more he or she can help the hospital streamline the process. There are several key components to compliance:

  1. Location: Unless an exception applies, the new department must be located within a 35-mile radius of the hospital.
  2. Licensure: The physician practice must operate under the hospital’s license and provider number. This means the hospital will need to emend its license to include the new department. This may require the hospital to emend its accreditation with The Joint Commission to prove inclusion under the hospital license.
  3. Ownership: Except for certain on-campus joint ventures, the new department must be completely owned and controlled by the hospital. The ownership change process must be started as early as possible, because this can involve a lengthy negotiation between the selling physician and the hospital.
  4. Clinical integration: The clinical services at the new department must be integrated with the main hospital. This requires the following:
    1. Professional staff have privileges at the main provider;
    2. Hospital maintains oversight over the new department as it would any other department;
    3. Medical records are integrated or cross-referenced to the hospital’s medical records. This can be a significant undertaking, so ensure the hospital’s IT staff is involved as early as possible; and
    4. Department staff (other than the physician or physician assistants) must be employed by the hospital and receive the same employee benefits and salary structure as other hospital employees.
  5. Financial integration: The new department must appear as an identifiable cost center on the hospital’s trial balance.
  6. Timing: If eligibility for other federal programs is an incentive for the conversion, it is important to be mindful of the timeframes for implementing those programs.

These factors must be kept in mind when converting a physician practice to a provider-based department of the hospital.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE
ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:Legal UpdatesPractice SupportProfessional TopicsQuality Assurance/Improvement Tagged with:HealthcareOutcomespatient carePractice Managementprovider-based

Related Articles

    Interplay Between Physician Employment Agreements, Medical Staff Bylaws Should Not be Ignored

    October 1, 2013

    Doctors must consider and review bylaws of hospital medical staff privileges when entertaining employment with a hospital or private practice

    Tail Insurance Protects Against Medical Malpractice Claims from Previous Jobs

    February 1, 2013

    Physicians who are resigning, retiring, switching jobs, or are terminated should consider tail insurance to cover malpractice claims brought after they’ve left their current employer

    Can Integrated Care Lead to Better Outcomes?

    Can Integrated Care Lead to Better Outcomes?

    December 17, 2018

    A typical patient with a rheumatic disease needs a multifaceted treatment approach to address comorbidities, minimize disability, promote quality of life and improve survival. To achieve these outcomes, rheumatology research has evolved from examining a single treatment to studying the best treatment approaches. Examples of these strategy trials include how to best combine pharmaceutical therapies,…

    The reasons rheumatologists choose hospital or academic employment vary. It comes down to what they value.

    Rheumatologists Weigh Pros, Cons of Working in Academia

    April 19, 2017

    Some rheumatologists find that an option other than working in a private practice makes the most sense for them. The reasons rheumatologists choose hospital or academic employment vary. Individual Choice When Lisa Criscione-Schreiber, MD, MEd, associate professor of medicine and rheumatology training program director, Duke University, Durham, N.C., was finishing her fellowship in 2003, she…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences