Video: Every Case Tells a Story| Webinar: ACR/CHEST ILD Guidelines in Practice

An official publication of the ACR and the ARP serving rheumatologists and rheumatology professionals

  • Conditions
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout and Crystalline Arthritis
    • Myositis
    • Osteoarthritis and Bone Disorders
    • Pain Syndromes
    • Pediatric Conditions
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Sjögren’s Disease
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    • Systemic Sclerosis
    • Vasculitis
    • Other Rheumatic Conditions
  • FocusRheum
    • ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
    • Axial Spondyloarthritis
    • Gout
    • Psoriatic Arthritis
    • Rheumatoid Arthritis
    • Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • Guidance
    • Clinical Criteria/Guidelines
    • Ethics
    • Legal Updates
    • Legislation & Advocacy
    • Meeting Reports
      • ACR Convergence
      • Other ACR meetings
      • EULAR/Other
    • Research Rheum
  • Drug Updates
    • Analgesics
    • Biologics/DMARDs
  • Practice Support
    • Billing/Coding
    • EMRs
    • Facility
    • Insurance
    • QA/QI
    • Technology
    • Workforce
  • Opinion
    • Patient Perspective
    • Profiles
    • Rheuminations
      • Video
    • Speak Out Rheum
  • Career
    • ACR ExamRheum
    • Awards
    • Career Development
  • ACR
    • ACR Home
    • ACR Convergence
    • ACR Guidelines
    • Journals
      • ACR Open Rheumatology
      • Arthritis & Rheumatology
      • Arthritis Care & Research
    • From the College
    • Events/CME
    • President’s Perspective
  • Search

RA Patients May Be Less Likely to Discontinue Etanercept Than Other TNF Inhibitors

Lara C. Pullen, PhD  |  January 8, 2020

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may discontinue the use of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors if they feel a loss or lack of treatment efficacy. They may also discontinue use due to adverse events. A recent analysis of RA patients found that more patients who received etanercept remained on the treatment after 12 months than those who received other TNF inhibitors. The Journal of Rheumatology published the systematic literature review by Paul Emery, MA, MD, Arthritis Research U.K. professor of rheumatology and head of Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine at the University of Leeds and colleagues online June 1, 2019.1

The initial research yielded a total of 4,412 publications. However, the final analysis included 133 full publications and 37 conference abstracts for a total of 270,000 RA patients. Fourteen of 170 publications had overlapping patient data from six data sources. The studies’ documented mean or median follow-up time ranged from 12 months to 12 years. There was some inconsistency regarding reports on mean and median at baseline 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), as well as presentation for overall scores for all treatments vs. scores separated according to specific TNF inhibitor.

ad goes here:advert-1
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

The researchers found treatment with etanercept was associated with the highest rate of drug survival among the five TNF interferon inhibitors currently used to treat RA. The authors define drug survival as the proportion of patients still receiving treatment at a certain timepoint and evaluated patient retention, persistence and continuation. They note that there were very little data on certolizumab pegol and golimumab, which appeared in only two of the 170 publications and abstracts. In the first-line setting, drug survival rate at 12 months was 71% for etanercept, 69% for infliximab and 70% for adalimumab. At 12–24 months, the survival rate was 63% for etanercept, 57% for infliximab and 59% for adalimumab. In the second-line setting, the drug survival rate at 12 months was 61% for etanercept, 69% for infliximab and 55% for adalimumab. At 12–24 months, it was 53% for etanercept, 39% for infliximab and 43% for adalimumab.

When the authors excluded publications that did not separate data into specific treatment types, they found that, when they analyzed drug survival rate greater than 36 months, it was 59% for etanercept, 49% for infliximab and 51% for adalimumab in the first-line setting. In the second-line setting, the rates were 56%, 48% and 41%, respectively. The discontinuation rate at 36 months of follow-up was 38–48% for etanercept, 42–62% for infliximab and 38–59% for adalimumab. When researchers looked at discontinuation due to adverse events at 36 months of follow-up, they found patients receiving etanercept had the lowest rates of discontinuation (8–16%) followed by patients receiving adalimumab (8–26%) and patients receiving infliximab (15–27%).

ad goes here:advert-2
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE

Page: 1 2 | Single Page
Share: 

Filed under:ConditionsRheumatoid Arthritis Tagged with:etanerceptRheumatoid Arthritis (RA)TNF inhibitors

Related Articles

    TNF Blockade for SLE

    September 1, 2010

    Reckless approach versus missed opportunity?

    Remembering Etanercept & the Advent of the Biologic Era

    February 10, 2020

    As a veteran rheumatologist, I remember the clinical trials of etanercept’s (Enbrel’s) efficacy. And when the drug was first approved in 1998, I participated in those clinical trials and realized the effectiveness was astonishing. It was easy to tell which patients were treated with etanercept vs. those who received placebo, even though both groups were…

    Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 3: Rheumatoid Arthritis

    August 16, 2019

    Over the past few years, bio­similars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug options, others have few or only off-label options. This series, “Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance,” provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and small molecule inhibitor drugs…

    Andrew Brookes / Image Source on Offset

    Clinical Insights into Axial Spondyloarthritis: Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, Part 5

    February 10, 2022

    Over the past few years, biosimilars and other new drugs have been introduced to treat rheumatic illnesses. Some of the conditions we treat have numerous drug options; others have few or only off-label options. This series, Rheumatology Drugs at a Glance, provides streamlined information on the administration of biologic, biosimilar and other medications used to…

  • About Us
  • Meet the Editors
  • Issue Archives
  • Contribute
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1931-3268 (print). ISSN 1931-3209 (online).
  • DEI Statement
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences